Google to Shame Unencrypted Websites

frogboy

In memoriam 1961-2018
Thread author
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Jun 9, 2013
6,720
Google Chrome will start ‘shaming’ unecrypted websites beginning in January.

The next version of the Chrome browser, Chrome 56, will mark HTTP login pages as "not secure" in a window next to the address bar.

Historically, Chrome has not explicitly labeled unencrypted connections as non-secure. According to Emily Schechter of the Chrome security team, those sites that transmit passwords or credit cards will be the first to be called out for a lack of “HTTPS,” followed by any unencrypted pages launched in “Incognito” mode, where users may have higher expectations of privacy. The long-term plan is to mark all HTTP sites as non-secure, using a red triangle indicator.

“Chrome currently indicates HTTP connections with a neutral indicator. This doesn’t reflect the true lack of security for HTTP connections,” she said in a blog. “When you load a website over HTTP, someone else on the network can look at or modify the site before it gets to you.”

She pointed out that a substantial portion of web traffic has transitioned to HTTPS so far: More than half of Chrome desktop page loads now served over HTTPS.

“Our plan to label HTTP sites more clearly and accurately as non-secure will take place in gradual steps, based on increasingly stringent criteria,” she said. “Studies show that users do not perceive the lack of a ‘secure’ icon as a warning, but also that users become blind to warnings that occur too frequently.

Kevin Bocek, VP of security strategy and threat intelligence for Venafi, told Infosecurity that while Google is taking a great step toward improving security on the web, it remains to be seen if users will pay attention.

Full Article. Google to Shame Unencrypted Websites
 

Cohen

Level 7
Verified
Well-known
May 22, 2016
328
Glad to see Google taking more steps to pressure sites into using HTTPS.
With Chrome Canary showing a lock and saying "Secure" in green on secure sites, I feel a lot safer while on them, and I'm sure others will too.
9hhCZiI.png

Chrome Canary already shows "Not Secure" on some sites, while it's rare (for me), I've seen it before.
01bK3PK.png


Very nice read Frog, thanks for sharing. :)
 

_CyberGhosT_

Level 53
Verified
Honorary Member
Top Poster
Content Creator
Well-known
Aug 2, 2015
4,286
I support this step by Google, encryption is a must.
I am sure that "http" sites will offer their users Firefox :p :D
Really ?
With FireFox I have an addon that gives me the option of https, just in case the site is not https fitted yet, in chrome you will soon not have that option, you will be just SOL.
I use FF and they collect far less data, and I find it more user friendly. Chrome scarfs up your info and will now dictate the sites you can access. I agree with the HTTPS steps don't get me wrong, but they mask all the negative they do in good intentions, and many choose not to see it I guess. ;)
 
Last edited:
Y

yigido

Really ?
With FireFox I have an addon that gives me the option of https, just in case the site is not https fitted yet, in chrome you will soon not have that option, you will be just SOL.
I use FF and they collect far less data, and I find it more user friendly. Chrome scarfs up your info and will now dictate the sites you can access. I agree with the HTTPS steps don't get me wrong, but they mask all the negative they do in good intentions, and many choose not to see it I guess. ;)
I tried to make myself use Firefox for dialy usage. I cannot!
Chrome is more secure! (not private maybe) than Firefox. I disabled the all "by default" data collection options as possible as I can.
I disabled all myactivity actions on my Google account and I never surf while I am using Gmail ;)
So what Google can get from me? I do not know but it is lesser than Firefox defaults ;)
If Google likes spying on me, what they will get? I love malwares hunting, MalwareTips and some other same stuff. Have fun Google, if you want to be boring :D
 

darko999

Level 17
Verified
Well-known
Oct 2, 2014
825
FF or Chrome in the present are pretty much the same with some differences tho, but it's not as different as it was in the past; that's a fact. If you bother that much about privacy why not go Pale Moon they have like the best privacy on default compared to the rest, of course that it is a different browser compared to Chrome and FF and you may not like it but then if you pick Chrome or FF why even bother about data collection I believe they would just do it one or another way at the end of the road just like Microsoft with Windows 10. You can use some checkbox and some addons to improve privacy but it ends there. They will always gather data, and not using Chrome but using other Google Services gets you nowhere close to privacy. I would just pick a safe browser, use proper addons, get proper settings; and make sure it works as you want. Then if I care that much about privacy I would just go the Pale Moon way.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: yigido and frogboy

About us

  • MalwareTips is a community-driven platform providing the latest information and resources on malware and cyber threats. Our team of experienced professionals and passionate volunteers work to keep the internet safe and secure. We provide accurate, up-to-date information and strive to build a strong and supportive community dedicated to cybersecurity.

User Menu

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter to know first about the latest cybersecurity incidents and malware threats.

Top