Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Hard_Configurator Tools
Hard_Configurator - Windows Hardening Configurator
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 97327" data-source="post: 1032493"><p>Fun fact 1: from a behavioral viewpoint home users are always unmanaged (when you refer to home user as the people using it at home), it is like saying a strainer leaks (a strainer which does not leak by definition is not a strainer anymore).</p><p></p><p>Fun fact 2: from a technical viewpoint when you refer to the PC of a home user (in your quote above), a PC which would have extensive LoLBin blocking and system hardening, technically that PC would not be unmanaged anymore.</p><p></p><p>Fun fact 3: using grandiloquent language while trying to convince (other) people that your 'best practice' is the best 'best practice', actually is not a best practice itself</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I know you like to disagree with people, so we, your friends at MT, give you the attention and importance you deserve, but read again: <strong><em>little or no use cases</em></strong> for <strong><em>needing the blocked</em></strong> LilBins in other words 95% of the home users don't need the programs in the LoLBin list. It is true that it is not exactly your quote. I added "little or no use", because there might be some corner cases where people need them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 97327, post: 1032493"] Fun fact 1: from a behavioral viewpoint home users are always unmanaged (when you refer to home user as the people using it at home), it is like saying a strainer leaks (a strainer which does not leak by definition is not a strainer anymore). Fun fact 2: from a technical viewpoint when you refer to the PC of a home user (in your quote above), a PC which would have extensive LoLBin blocking and system hardening, technically that PC would not be unmanaged anymore. Fun fact 3: using grandiloquent language while trying to convince (other) people that your 'best practice' is the best 'best practice', actually is not a best practice itself I know you like to disagree with people, so we, your friends at MT, give you the attention and importance you deserve, but read again: [B][I]little or no use cases[/I][/B] for [B][I]needing the blocked[/I][/B] LilBins in other words 95% of the home users don't need the programs in the LoLBin list. It is true that it is not exactly your quote. I added "little or no use", because there might be some corner cases where people need them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top