Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Hard_Configurator Tools
Hard_Configurator - Windows Hardening Configurator
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 743578" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>Adding a long list of <span style="color: rgb(85, 57, 130)"><strong>vulnerable processes via <Block Sponsors> </strong></span>is usually not required if one can properly adjust Guarded Applications in AppGuard. The idea is to protect by Guarded Applications feature all those applications which can be abused to run <span style="color: rgb(85, 57, 130)"><strong>vulnerable processes</strong></span>. Some applications (like MS Word) are protected in AppGuard by default.</p><p>If the above is not possible in AppGuard because the user needs <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>all features of the application</strong></span> (a few can be not functional when guarded), then blocking <span style="color: rgb(85, 57, 130)"><strong>vulnerable processes</strong></span> via Hard_Configurator <span style="color: rgb(85, 57, 130)"><strong><Block Sponsors> </strong></span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">can be considered. </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">Before adding Hard_Configurator to AppGuard protection, I would suggest replacing the </span><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>conflicting application </strong></span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">with another one which can be both usable and guarded by AppGuard.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">Generally, using AppGuard with Hard_Configurator makes the setup complicated.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 743578, member: 32260"] Adding a long list of [COLOR=rgb(85, 57, 130)][B]vulnerable processes via <Block Sponsors> [/B][/COLOR]is usually not required if one can properly adjust Guarded Applications in AppGuard. The idea is to protect by Guarded Applications feature all those applications which can be abused to run [COLOR=rgb(85, 57, 130)][B]vulnerable processes[/B][/COLOR]. Some applications (like MS Word) are protected in AppGuard by default. If the above is not possible in AppGuard because the user needs [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]all features of the application[/B][/COLOR] (a few can be not functional when guarded), then blocking [COLOR=rgb(85, 57, 130)][B]vulnerable processes[/B][/COLOR] via Hard_Configurator [COLOR=rgb(85, 57, 130)][B]<Block Sponsors> [/B][/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]can be considered. Before adding Hard_Configurator to AppGuard protection, I would suggest replacing the [/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]conflicting application [/B][/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]with another one which can be both usable and guarded by AppGuard. Generally, using AppGuard with Hard_Configurator makes the setup complicated.[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top