Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Hard_Configurator Tools
Hard_Configurator - Windows Hardening Configurator
Message
<blockquote data-quote="simmerskool" data-source="post: 817759" data-attributes="member: 61091"><p>I saw Andy's post the other day (could not find it last night) suggesting if running cf@cs (cruelcomodo) don't run H_C, or osarmor, or syshardener, or voodooshield. I've been using cf@cs for many months, and installed H_C a few weeks ago with default settings, and I did not see any apparent conflict, and best I could tell H_C was doing its thing, saw no slowdown. (Also a great thread for knowledge). BUT I was checking into cf settings since it has updated to v12, and decided to disable H_C. I was going to uninstall H_C but got the popup warning about reverting to windows (7) defaults, so I left H_C installed but disable or rather not enabled. So the question is about <u>redundancy</u>. Does H_C offer a layer of protection not provided by cf@cs? I imagine if yes, then tweaks are needed. What about voodooshield with cf@cs, does VS offer any additional protection, or just redundant? I asked Dan about this in the past, but he was not familiar enough with cf to comment, but said if there's no conflict, ok to leave VS installed. feedback / explanations welcome. thanks!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="simmerskool, post: 817759, member: 61091"] I saw Andy's post the other day (could not find it last night) suggesting if running cf@cs (cruelcomodo) don't run H_C, or osarmor, or syshardener, or voodooshield. I've been using cf@cs for many months, and installed H_C a few weeks ago with default settings, and I did not see any apparent conflict, and best I could tell H_C was doing its thing, saw no slowdown. (Also a great thread for knowledge). BUT I was checking into cf settings since it has updated to v12, and decided to disable H_C. I was going to uninstall H_C but got the popup warning about reverting to windows (7) defaults, so I left H_C installed but disable or rather not enabled. So the question is about [U]redundancy[/U]. Does H_C offer a layer of protection not provided by cf@cs? I imagine if yes, then tweaks are needed. What about voodooshield with cf@cs, does VS offer any additional protection, or just redundant? I asked Dan about this in the past, but he was not familiar enough with cf to comment, but said if there's no conflict, ok to leave VS installed. feedback / explanations welcome. thanks! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top