Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Hard_Configurator Tools
Hard_Configurator - Windows Hardening Configurator
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 92963" data-source="post: 965006"><p>[USER=71262]@oldschool[/USER]</p><p>People simply don't read manuals, no matter how well they are written.</p><p></p><p>[USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER]</p><p>You broke two rules which makes the procedure non intuive. I will try to explain.</p><p></p><p>First you start with a question (if you are applying the protection for child of inexperienced user) and ask the user to come into action when that is NOT the case.</p><p></p><p>In good UX users should NOT have to chance anything when it is NOT applicable I am not installing it for a child, so I asume h the application keeps things as they are (but you are changing it from visible to invisible).</p><p></p><p>Secondly you refer to the user's experience level. As this case shows 90% of the inexperienced users think they are experienced.</p><p></p><p>Ironically this inexperienced user who thinks he is an experienced user makes the wrong decision because of the UX-mistake you made. Or when you did set this UX-trap on purpose it is brilliant, because it makes inexperienced users who don't RTFM make the right choice for their experience level <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😀" title="Grinning face :grinning:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" data-shortname=":grinning:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 92963, post: 965006"] [USER=71262]@oldschool[/USER] People simply don't read manuals, no matter how well they are written. [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER] You broke two rules which makes the procedure non intuive. I will try to explain. First you start with a question (if you are applying the protection for child of inexperienced user) and ask the user to come into action when that is NOT the case. In good UX users should NOT have to chance anything when it is NOT applicable I am not installing it for a child, so I asume h the application keeps things as they are (but you are changing it from visible to invisible). Secondly you refer to the user's experience level. As this case shows 90% of the inexperienced users think they are experienced. Ironically this inexperienced user who thinks he is an experienced user makes the wrong decision because of the UX-mistake you made. Or when you did set this UX-trap on purpose it is brilliant, because it makes inexperienced users who don't RTFM make the right choice for their experience level 😀 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top