Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
HOME ANTI- MALWARE PROTECTION JUL - SEP 2018
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mahesh Sudula" data-source="post: 773660" data-attributes="member: 65679"><p>Normal end user doesn't need these features at all..Because they never work!</p><p>If u clearly examine, Eset was vulnerable to all the ransom attacks during outbreak!</p><p>Though they claim they blocked WC through firewall eternal blue ..Even that's a signature based update..Their Uefi scanner god should know!</p><p>How would I expect these features from a vendor to work who cannot just come up </p><p>with a BB </p><p>Moreover Avast , Quick heal , G data all these guys are better over eset in every part since they have balanced protection..But these results are just opposite</p><p>If I remember correctly Nss labs sued some vendors claiming to influence the tests and results, Eset Avira McAfee were in that list!</p><p>Nothing against Eset, but facts should be out right !</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mahesh Sudula, post: 773660, member: 65679"] Normal end user doesn't need these features at all..Because they never work! If u clearly examine, Eset was vulnerable to all the ransom attacks during outbreak! Though they claim they blocked WC through firewall eternal blue ..Even that's a signature based update..Their Uefi scanner god should know! How would I expect these features from a vendor to work who cannot just come up with a BB Moreover Avast , Quick heal , G data all these guys are better over eset in every part since they have balanced protection..But these results are just opposite If I remember correctly Nss labs sued some vendors claiming to influence the tests and results, Eset Avira McAfee were in that list! Nothing against Eset, but facts should be out right ! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
