Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Soulbound" data-source="post: 473255" data-attributes="member: 33155">Virtual Desktops were not present in previous incarnations of Windows, while windows snap feature were.Virtual Desktops is very handy for single screen users, such as laptops. I myself use it constanstly as I do run my games in Windows borderless mode, have other applications opened and do not like the clutter.On linux, every desktop environment has such feature (KDE, Unity, LXDE, LXQT, XFCE, Gnome 3, MATE, Cinnamon). For window managers, Open Box with Tint Panel combo/Open Box with LXpanel/Open Box with XFCE Panel/FluxBox/i3 window manager/Awesome window manager all have this function.Old NIDIA users from XP era who had nVIEW software installed also had a tool from NVIDIA who gave virtual desktops (tho later reincarnations were only available in the QUATTRO cards).On a side note, it is interesting to see the poll results. I expected the 3rd option to be higher, not the 2nd one.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Soulbound, post: 473255, member: 33155"] Virtual Desktops were not present in previous incarnations of Windows, while windows snap feature were. Virtual Desktops is very handy for single screen users, such as laptops. I myself use it constanstly as I do run my games in Windows borderless mode, have other applications opened and do not like the clutter. On linux, every desktop environment has such feature (KDE, Unity, LXDE, LXQT, XFCE, Gnome 3, MATE, Cinnamon). For window managers, Open Box with Tint Panel combo/Open Box with LXpanel/Open Box with XFCE Panel/FluxBox/i3 window manager/Awesome window manager all have this function. Old NIDIA users from XP era who had nVIEW software installed also had a tool from NVIDIA who gave virtual desktops (tho later reincarnations were only available in the QUATTRO cards). On a side note, it is interesting to see the poll results. I expected the 3rd option to be higher, not the 2nd one. [/QUOTE]

Verification