Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 178" data-source="post: 714467">did you analyzed the code?probably the code loading the GUI is similar to ransomwares?Did you contacted those vendors to ask them why they flagged it.when a cop see from afar a guy pointing a fake gun to people? should he ignores him because he is not sure if it is a serious threat?Maybe be their heuristic is too high, and it is the issue most small vendors have, because they don&#039;t have the resources or network like big ones to do a better filtering. They are more often subject to FPs.I am aware of the Kaspersky statement, to me this is more marketing to look awesome:&nbsp; &quot;hey guys they copy us, we are so awesome &quot;...Most vendors often share their results between each others, and most of them use VT. So Kaspersky statement is quite funny.To me the problem in this thread is not that the file was flagged as malicious or not, it is your &quot;copy&quot; statement without any valid investigations.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Deleted member 178, post: 714467"] did you analyzed the code? probably the code loading the GUI is similar to ransomwares? Did you contacted those vendors to ask them why they flagged it. when a cop see from afar a guy pointing a fake gun to people? should he ignores him because he is not sure if it is a serious threat? Maybe be their heuristic is too high, and it is the issue most small vendors have, because they don't have the resources or network like big ones to do a better filtering. They are more often subject to FPs. I am aware of the Kaspersky statement, to me this is more marketing to look awesome: "hey guys they copy us, we are so awesome "... Most vendors often share their results between each others, and most of them use VT. So Kaspersky statement is quite funny. To me the problem in this thread is not that the file was flagged as malicious or not, it is your "copy" statement without any valid investigations. [/QUOTE]

Verification