- Feb 25, 2017
- 2,595
- Content source
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWT9wyGLs30
I can't comment on something that's not fit for viewing. LOA must be using speed!
Some parts in this video was actually very innovative and fresh. Haven't seen it elsewhere. This little part in that screenshot as an example. Thank's @SecureKongo for helping highlight it.
the audio sounds like a satanic
Sorry for any inconvenience, without FF this test will take forever (50p allows you to slow down the video) and music is royalty free. In this video first part is on Autopilot, and second half was on Smart mode. Please feel free to ask any question here or in the comment section.
The whole tone of this thread is going to be anti-League of Antivirus. The hive will say you are the problem, and not the software you tested. They will say your test is flawed, and the bypass you discovered is not legitimate.
Just keep an eye on the posts. It's already happening. Ad hominems and aspersions have been cast against you.
Really ? You mean like how MTers bash PC Security Channel at every opportunity and any other video test by any other author they disagree with ?
The post history is public here. All one need do is look back at how the hive and fanbois behave here.
If you don't like the way people are behaving here on MT then why are you even taking the time to read through all of this? Nobody was saying that his testing failed or that he was faking the bypass. Stop making problems where there aren't any. The only thing people are criticising is the video editing.The whole tone of this thread is going to be anti-League of Antivirus. The hive will say you are the problem, and not the software you tested. They will say your test is flawed, and the bypass you discovered is not legitimate.
Just keep an eye on the posts. It's already happening. Ad hominems and aspersions have been cast against you.
True that he is getting a lot of hate here, but that is his own fault for the most part. He has quite a big audience on Youtube and because of this some kind of responsibility. Testing AV's half-hearted like he does with Microsoft Defender just doesn't help anybody.Really ? You mean like how MTers bash PC Security Channel at every opportunity and any other video test by any other author they disagree with ?
The post history is public here. All one need do is look back at how the hive and fanbois behave here.
Are you willing to publicly state that malware did indeed disable VoodooShield, and that it was not VoodooShield's auto-deactivation feature that switched VoodooShield to OFF Mode?The whole tone of this thread is going to be anti-League of Antivirus. The hive will say you are the problem, and not the software you tested. They will say your test is flawed, and the bypass you discovered is not legitimate.
Just keep an eye on the posts. It's already happening. Ad hominems and aspersions have been cast against you.
It is not. Simply it is not possible to make reliable protection test in this way. Even the professional AV Labs are not able to do this in one test that lasts about one or two months. So even if one is a genius, the video test will be only a kind of demonstration of how the program works.The whole tone of this thread is going to be anti-League of Antivirus.