The interesting thing about the whole Iobit/MBAM debacle is that Iobit made a public apology that they made some mistakes and are sorry for it, but they still contested that they did not steal the MBAM definitions, but received those samples through their malware submission page.
Ummm.... But those samples never left the MBAM labs. Not to mention that the samples weren't even malware, just a bit of code to trigger those particular dummy signatures. So even if some rogue developer at MBAM uploaded them to Iobit,
why then would Iobits malware team define them as malware when they weren't? (Don't even question how they managed to name the signatures for those samples the same thing MBAM did...)
So if they were still sticking to their guns about the theft, what were they apologizing for? :huh: