Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
VoodooShield
Is Cyberlock (Always ON) considered bullet-proof against sophisticated malware?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 107474" data-source="post: 1073155"><p>I dare to disagree with above eminences <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>SRP is a build-in mechanism which hardly cost processing power. Windows does not need scripts to run for updates in user folders. I can;t see why average users need scripts to run in user folders. Most of CruelSister's made malware is started through risky file extensions. Plenty of reasons to use Andy's SWH as companion to block risky file extensions in user folders. The weak point of SRP is that this security mechanism itself also lives in userland.</p><p></p><p>Windows Defender on MAX has excellent embedded code protection for mail and office documents. Windows Defender on Max uses less CPU than WD on High or High+ and acts as a cloud whitelist for executable's. The weak point of (the very strong cloud whitelist) is that it is a huge and massive whitelist (a smaller whitelist is a more secure whitelist) and it has a very limited (only the ASR part) parent-child process monitor to deal with staged attacks.</p><p></p><p>Microsoft offers WDAC and Smart Application Control on top of these Windows mechanism to overcome the weaknesses mentioned. I look at CyberLock as a more granular and flexible WDAC or SAC and it remembers your decisions (in contrast to UAC). So why would SWH and WD-max be an overkill with CL, when CyberLock functions an improved (AI based) UAC/SAC?</p><p></p><p>The best reason to choose CL over SAC is that CL is backed by a developer who reacts rapidly on user issues (try that with M$ when SAC blocks your el cheapo unsigned restaurant menu designer).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 107474, post: 1073155"] I dare to disagree with above eminences ;) SRP is a build-in mechanism which hardly cost processing power. Windows does not need scripts to run for updates in user folders. I can;t see why average users need scripts to run in user folders. Most of CruelSister's made malware is started through risky file extensions. Plenty of reasons to use Andy's SWH as companion to block risky file extensions in user folders. The weak point of SRP is that this security mechanism itself also lives in userland. Windows Defender on MAX has excellent embedded code protection for mail and office documents. Windows Defender on Max uses less CPU than WD on High or High+ and acts as a cloud whitelist for executable's. The weak point of (the very strong cloud whitelist) is that it is a huge and massive whitelist (a smaller whitelist is a more secure whitelist) and it has a very limited (only the ASR part) parent-child process monitor to deal with staged attacks. Microsoft offers WDAC and Smart Application Control on top of these Windows mechanism to overcome the weaknesses mentioned. I look at CyberLock as a more granular and flexible WDAC or SAC and it remembers your decisions (in contrast to UAC). So why would SWH and WD-max be an overkill with CL, when CyberLock functions an improved (AI based) UAC/SAC? The best reason to choose CL over SAC is that CL is backed by a developer who reacts rapidly on user issues (try that with M$ when SAC blocks your el cheapo unsigned restaurant menu designer). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top