Documenting disparaging claims made by individuals who communicate directly with, and are best friends with competitors, is not stalking.Says the developer that has been stalking others, incorrectly testing what he views competition products, misinforming average users, all while trying to promote his product and make money. This, is unbecoming of a Developer that is supposed to have everyone's well being as top priority.
mWave (Visa), this is obviously you as well… THAT is stalking.
I am not to one who said that VS would not block the EB / DP attack, while products with memory protection would block the attack. I was curious as well, and tired of people speculating, so I ran the test that was requested. The end result is that VS blocked the attack, and the product with memory protection did not. End of story.
Running the tests actually informed the users. Instead of speculating, they were able to experience the empirical evidence for themselves.
The tests were completely valid… I even reran the AG test with lsass protected, according to Umbra’s instruction, and the results were the same.
If you have a suggestion on how I can improve the tests, let me know and I will retest… but do not say that the tests were invalid, without explaining why you feel they are invalid, or how what changes are necessary to make them valid.