- Sep 28, 2011
- 326
Hi guys
This is my security setup.I'm waiting for your thoughts,thank you.
This is my security setup.I'm waiting for your thoughts,thank you.
Last edited:
Joe Black's Security Configuration
- Thread starter VladDracul
- Start date
- Apr 30, 2012
- 711
Perfect.
Though I would ask is it so necessary to sandbox SRWIron as chromiums are very safe per se?
Though I would ask is it so necessary to sandbox SRWIron as chromiums are very safe per se?
- Sep 28, 2011
- 326
I know about the discussion that Sandboxie is redundant on SRWIron or Chrome for example,but it gives me a plus feeling of strength and security
And i'm happy with it.Thank you for your thoughts.
- Apr 30, 2012
- 711
The second great thing in sandboxing a browser is that after deleting the sandbox the HD got cleaned of huge amount junk.I know about the discussion that Sandboxie is redundant on SRWIron or Chrome for example,but it gives me a plus feeling of strength and security
Thank you for your thoughts.
- Sep 28, 2011
- 326
- Oct 23, 2012
- 12,527
- Sep 28, 2011
- 326
Thank you too.Looks good!! Thanks for sharing your config
I currently have Avast Free AV (File Shield only) installed, but I've used SBIE before and during my time using it, it reminded me if the sandbox hadn't been cleared for more than 10 days.
- Apr 30, 2012
- 711
Good info. I never went so far without cleaning the sandbox, so I didn't know.
- Sep 28, 2011
- 326
Same here,mine is set up to delete automatically when i close my browsers.
- Sep 28, 2011
- 326
Switched to Comodo full suite and added SS Free.I know,it's redundant,but my paranoia has to be "pleased"
Oh,and i removed SBIE as for me Comodo's sandbox fulfill my needs.
Oh,and i removed SBIE as for me Comodo's sandbox fulfill my needs.
- Apr 30, 2012
- 711
Maybe it's better to add MBAE? I believe it won't be redundant to CIS.Switched to Comodo full suite and added SS Free.I know,it's redundant,but my paranoia has to be "pleased"
Oh,and i removed SBIE as for me Comodo's sandbox fulfill my needs.
- Mar 23, 2015
- 555
Switched to Comodo full suite and added SS Free.I know,it's redundant,but my paranoia has to be "pleased"
Oh,and i removed SBIE as for me Comodo's sandbox fulfill my needs.
The problem is that redundant feature might decrease the protection capability.
I heard that there are some malwares that could be blocked if you use any one of Spyshelter and Outpost, but could not be defended if you use both of them together.
I am afraid that this issue might also apply to your combo.
- Sep 28, 2011
- 326
Well,i think it's not my case..Outpost works in a diferent maner of Comodo's sandbox,as i have HIPS disabled.But feel free to give us a link or any details about the SS and Outpost issue...And i will judge if this is applying to my combo...
- Sep 28, 2011
- 326
- Mar 23, 2015
- 555
Here is the post on this issue. But the OP claimed that he had removed the malware sample that could incur this issue.
Sorry I am unable to provide more details.
Good update, Comodo is reliable, thx for sharing @JoeBlack40
- Sep 28, 2011
- 326
Thanks,but i feel very safe and problems free with CIS and SS.It's not my first "date" with this combo,as i used to use it 2 or 3 years ago,and again,problems free.And IF something goes wrong...that's why i have 3 backup and imaging software for!
Why opt for 32bit OS when 64bit is more secure than 32bit.
Similar threads
