Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Battlefield
Software Comparison
K7 vs Quick Heal vs ESET - Please help me to choose
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Der.Reisende" data-source="post: 993739" data-attributes="member: 32430"><p>Can't go wrong with ESET.</p><p>Best in class signatures (next to Kaspersky and Avast), haven't test it for some time, but I think the snag is the missing / weak behaviour blocker. HIPS can be naggy if wrong configured.</p><p></p><p>Still using K7 (bought Infinity (=lifetime) version of Total Security for 70$, good deal for 5 devices IMO). - EDIT as you're from India, both Indian products will come at a way cheaper rate.</p><p>Was a fan of Quick Heal (mainly because of the Behaviour Blocker), however it's signatures are really bad, even the advertised ML engine did not come up often; I tested it recently. Not worth the outside India price at all. To my opinion, K7 has come close in terms of behaviour protection lately (K7 gets regular version upgrades, via signatures, no reboot needed).</p><p>K7 BB gets better in time IMO (also against ransomware), still weak against script malware, though they integrated AMSI protection lately (maybe TS version exclusive).</p><p>For best protection, pair it with AppCheck AntiRansomware free, which also covers #Magniber and #Netwalker.</p><p>In terms of Web Protection, I think both are ok (super weak against phising).</p><p></p><p>As for overall speed, K7>Quick Heal.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Big +1 on the obsolete manual updates, which can lead to a security risk IMO, who regularly checks for new versions?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Der.Reisende, post: 993739, member: 32430"] Can't go wrong with ESET. Best in class signatures (next to Kaspersky and Avast), haven't test it for some time, but I think the snag is the missing / weak behaviour blocker. HIPS can be naggy if wrong configured. Still using K7 (bought Infinity (=lifetime) version of Total Security for 70$, good deal for 5 devices IMO). - EDIT as you're from India, both Indian products will come at a way cheaper rate. Was a fan of Quick Heal (mainly because of the Behaviour Blocker), however it's signatures are really bad, even the advertised ML engine did not come up often; I tested it recently. Not worth the outside India price at all. To my opinion, K7 has come close in terms of behaviour protection lately (K7 gets regular version upgrades, via signatures, no reboot needed). K7 BB gets better in time IMO (also against ransomware), still weak against script malware, though they integrated AMSI protection lately (maybe TS version exclusive). For best protection, pair it with AppCheck AntiRansomware free, which also covers #Magniber and #Netwalker. In terms of Web Protection, I think both are ok (super weak against phising). As for overall speed, K7>Quick Heal. Big +1 on the obsolete manual updates, which can lead to a security risk IMO, who regularly checks for new versions? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top