Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Battlefield
Software Comparison
K7 vs Quick Heal vs ESET - Please help me to choose
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowra" data-source="post: 993847" data-attributes="member: 92939"><p>Personally, given your configuration, I would opt for Eset.</p><p>Even if K7 is very good, it is below Eset in terms of detection.</p><p></p><p>Eset knows how to counter big attacks with Hexadecimal detections (basically, even if a malware is cleaned from its detections, if the code fragment that Eset added is not modified, it will be detected). We have seen this against VBS attacks (Eset detects the Trojan on arrival) or against the Magniber Ransomware which makes Antivirus suffer to block it efficiently.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowra, post: 993847, member: 92939"] Personally, given your configuration, I would opt for Eset. Even if K7 is very good, it is below Eset in terms of detection. Eset knows how to counter big attacks with Hexadecimal detections (basically, even if a malware is cleaned from its detections, if the code fragment that Eset added is not modified, it will be detected). We have seen this against VBS attacks (Eset detects the Trojan on arrival) or against the Magniber Ransomware which makes Antivirus suffer to block it efficiently. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
