- Content source
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8taaO3Hns8
Kaspersky Security Cloud Test with kyrox by roxasdev channel he claimed bypassed
Kaspersky Security Cloud Test
- Thread starter kylprq
- Start date
It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
- Oct 22, 2016
- 409
Maybe a new variant of Kyrox? =>
Special Samples - #Kyrox Ransomware
Special Samples - #Kyrox Ransomware
- Jul 14, 2015
- 773
- Apr 13, 2014
- 927
- Jul 29, 2018
- 566
He claim to be able to bypass every security SW, including Comodo (default-deny)
- Jul 6, 2017
- 2,392
Tremendous malware. 
edit.
I'd like Comodo to be tested with the default denial.
edit.
I'd like Comodo to be tested with the default denial.
- Sep 27, 2017
- 69
Would love to see another test with Comodo at Cruel sister settings.
Shocked to see Kaspersky fail to this!
Shocked to see Kaspersky fail to this!
Please names in the studio who ditched Kaspersky after this younoob 'test'?
- May 4, 2018
- 2,261
I would be fairly skeptical about the video. Maybe asking the author of a video in a text detailed way that he claims bypassed Kaspersky,as this video could send some users to automatically ditch Kaspersky based off this video alone.
~LDogg
~LDogg
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,910
Also Kaspersky Free products don't have Application Control, with a simple tweak that malware will probably be blocked, as I demonstrated last week in the MWHub with Scorpion 3.1 Kaspersky fail from a different video...
according to his videos, many other AVs with tweaked settings also failed against his own malwares (created for testing purpose)
Trendmicro, kaspersky, emsisoft, norton, malwarebytes, drweb, ikarus, cylance, AVG
Trendmicro, kaspersky, emsisoft, norton, malwarebytes, drweb, ikarus, cylance, AVG
- Oct 22, 2016
- 409
Tested in MT HUB. Things have gone differently.
the tested sample was his own variant. Perhaps, it is not the same as the result in the hub
or after the test, he said he submitted his sample to the vendors, then, they patched it
- Oct 22, 2016
- 409
@Evjl's Rain
Certainly. Perhaps the one used in this video is a new variant. We will never know without the "new" sample, unfortunately.
Certainly. Perhaps the one used in this video is a new variant. We will never know without the "new" sample, unfortunately.
- May 9, 2015
- 630
He build an encryption tool and called it as a virus ?
- Oct 8, 2018
- 127
- Dec 23, 2014
- 8,513
I am not sure why many MT members here are excited, that one can bypass the best AVs with never seen malware. This is a well known fact for years, and can be also seen when looking at the test results on Malware Hub. The recipe is simple. Find the malware that bypassed the AV, modify it slightly by yourself, and there is a fair chance that it will bypass this AV again.
The AVs are still very good against the malware in the wild, because the chances to get the never seen malware is close to 0.
The AVs are still very good against the malware in the wild, because the chances to get the never seen malware is close to 0.
Similar threads
