Battle KIS VS EIS

[kamry2009]

hi guys

i really want to know from you about Emsisoft Internet Security vs kis 2013

i use xp sp3

1> total protection
2>appliaction control
3>identity protection which found in kis but i dont know if this found also in Emsisoft Internet Security
4> heuristic analysis to unknown program or file
5>exploit prevention
6>network attack blocker

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

i know that bitdefender engine better than kis203
iknow that Emsisoft Internet Security have better firewall

but i know that kasper firewall its enough for proteciton

also now virus SIGNATURES not important because any new trogan or encrypterd server can bYPass the signiuers but kasper will put any unknown file with high [/b]restricted

the problem the haker kan byPass the APPLICATON control ? any one can tell me how the can do this?


iwant to know how we can make make kaspersky Restricts any unknown file


is there ant way to be safe from Encrypted servers and prevent these server form bypass application control?

i know there is some paid program can buy bass proactive proactive defense iwant to know how?!!

also iwant to know is there any one bypass winpatrol?



also about hacking by metasploit how we can be safe from this kind of hacking

 

[kamry2009]

>>>>>>>>>>

 

[jamescv7]

Hello

Pretty thing to avoid any hacks and exploit is to be vigilant and stay away from unknown source + updated through its patches especially in Windows itself.

I've found that EIS have superb protection than KIS since its using really aggressive in detection and KIS.

But KIS have an equalized coverage type thus make balance + low false positive rate.

In Application Control there's likely a configuration that any unknown signature will mark either, low restricted, high restricted or untrusted.

 

[kamry2009]

Hello

Pretty thing to avoid any hacks and exploit is to be vigilant and stay away from unknown source + updated through its patches especially in Windows itself.

I've found that EIS have superb protection than KIS since its using really aggressive in detection and KIS.

But KIS have an equalized coverage type thus make balance + low false positive rate.

In Application Control there's likely a configuration that any unknown signature will mark either, low restricted, high restricted or untrusted.

TRUE
but there is some program can bypass Application Control

how they do this and how we prevent that ?

 

[Akash209]

1> total protection : EIS
2> appliaction control : EIS
3> identity protection : EIS (help of mumutu & onlime amor)/ KIS
4> heuristic analysis to unknown program or file : EIS ( bcz both engine bitdefender and own)
5>exploit prevention : KIS
6>network attack blocker: EIS

 

[jamescv7]

From hackers basically they will analyzed very well on how Application Control works and the way perform then providing their own source code to conduct an injection process.

In order to prevent is report from its security software like Kaspersky providing patch and fix for vulnerability.

 

[Exterminator]

TRUE
but there is some program can bypass Application Control

how they do this and how we prevent that ?

You can use a sandbox such as Sandboxie to run programs and browse the web

I like KIS has provided me solid security for many years but EIM also provides excellent protection.Taking both for a test drive will be helpful in making a decision.

 

[Deleted member 178]

Ok here we go :

hi guys

i really want to know from you about Emsisoft Internet Security vs kis 2013

i use xp sp3

1> total protection : EIS
2> application control : EIS (Behavior Blocker, HIPS, file shield, etc...)
3> identity protection (which found in kis but i dont know if this found also in Emsisoft Internet Security): EIS has many ID protection especially via Online Armor Premium:
- a banking mode, an Anti-keylogger, anti-phishing,etc...
4> heuristic analysis to unknown program or file: EIS
5>exploit prevention: maybe KIS (EIS doesn't have any special module for that except its HIPS)
6>network attack blocker: i think both are equal

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

i know that bitdefender engine better than kis203
iknow that Emsisoft Internet Security have better firewall

but i know that kasper firewall its enough for proteciton

also now virus SIGNATURES not important because any new trogan or encrypterd server can bYPass the signiuers but kasper will put any unknown file with high [/b]restricted

but EIS has an HIPS, a policy-based sandbox (Runsafer) , a behavior Blocker.

 

[MrExplorer]

Overall Features: EIS
Detection: EIS
Prevention: EIS
Lightness: KIS used High CPU Usage & EIS uses HIGH Ram Usage
Slow Down: EIS (Not At All) , KIS (YES, A Lot)

I would go with EIS, I Found It 1 of the Best Security Suite.
I don't like KIS at all..

 

[Deleted member 178]

not to say that Emsisoft is actually developing a new firewall module from scratch.

 

[House_maniac]

not to say that Emsisoft is actually developing a new firewall module from scratch.

all modules will be implemented in only one software? thats what you mean?

 

[Deleted member 178]

Yes in a full suite, OA's Firewall module will be improved too with it.

 

[House_maniac]

Yes in a full suite, OA's Firewall module will be improved too with it.

thats great hope they fix the UI too