Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="n8chavez" data-source="post: 1102337" data-attributes="member: 90863">The thing that really bother me, and why I can no longer support Macrium in any way, shape, or form, is that they are flat-out lying to its users.&nbsp; They said the results of a poll they conducted said that users prefer the perpetual license, and they&#039;re using that as justification to say that&#039;s why they are no longer using the one-time-fee model.&nbsp; The thing is, that&#039;s a lie.&nbsp; When asked:YES: 7.63% - 10 votesNO: 68.7% - 90 votesDEPENDS on lease deal: 23.66% - 31 votersMacrium is not telling the truth here.&nbsp; And that means they&#039;ve allowed themselves the ability to get lazy, using the perpetual license as an excuse to stop innovation;&nbsp; they now have a revenue stream regardless of if they improve the product.&nbsp; Users now no longer have to see improvement in order to fork over their monies.[ATTACH]285549[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="n8chavez, post: 1102337, member: 90863"] The thing that really bother me, and why I can no longer support Macrium in any way, shape, or form, is that they are flat-out lying to its users. They said the results of a poll they conducted said that users prefer the perpetual license, and they're using that as justification to say that's why they are no longer using the one-time-fee model. The thing is, that's a lie. When asked: YES: 7.63% - 10 votes NO: 68.7% - 90 votes DEPENDS on lease deal: 23.66% - 31 voters Macrium is not telling the truth here. And that means they've allowed themselves the ability to get lazy, using the perpetual license as an excuse to stop innovation; they now have a revenue stream regardless of if they improve the product. Users now no longer have to see improvement in order to fork over their monies. [ATTACH]285549[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification