Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Malwarebytes 3.0.5.1299 - ransomware tests
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 587383" data-attributes="member: 32547"><p>Very nice test.</p><p></p><p>I have seen other tests where Malwarebytes 3.0 does well against ransomeware but with all the modules activated. Just saying, if I were going to pay over $35 a year for MB 3.0, I would want the ransomeware module to be effective at least. Should I be forced to add AppCheck after buying MB 3.0 which has a A/R module?</p><p></p><p>It makes me sad <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite111" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite119" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> to find myself asking if MB is purposely holding back with A/R development to scare current holders of their anti-ransomeware software in to buying MB 3.0. I have seen too many crazy scenarios like this in the past, although not from MB. Maybe MB are supremely confident in the rest of the program to do the job. But why even have A/R?</p><p></p><p>Disappointing <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite120" alt="o_O" title="Er... what? o_O" loading="lazy" data-shortname="o_O" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 587383, member: 32547"] Very nice test. I have seen other tests where Malwarebytes 3.0 does well against ransomeware but with all the modules activated. Just saying, if I were going to pay over $35 a year for MB 3.0, I would want the ransomeware module to be effective at least. Should I be forced to add AppCheck after buying MB 3.0 which has a A/R module? It makes me sad :(:rolleyes: to find myself asking if MB is purposely holding back with A/R development to scare current holders of their anti-ransomeware software in to buying MB 3.0. I have seen too many crazy scenarios like this in the past, although not from MB. Maybe MB are supremely confident in the rest of the program to do the job. But why even have A/R? Disappointing o_O [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top