Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Durew" data-source="post: 804361" data-attributes="member: 64794">Glad to know we agree.I still dislike that claim of MB.&nbsp;I&#039;d like to add that this is soley about MBAM along side a main AV. Even the experts on the MBAM are inclined to state that MBAM should be used alongside at least windows defender.&nbsp;This would indeed be the first test aimed at companion AV&#039;s that I heard of. Just to be sure, was this test hypothetical or did you actually manage perform it in such short notice?You can count on that. Just FWI, malwarebytes did post a description of what they see a fair test, it is mostly aimed at the anti-exploit component. (<a href="https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/191650-malwarebytes-3-frequently-asked-questions/?tab=comments#comment-1077438" target="_blank">Malwarebytes 3 - Frequently Asked Questions</a>).So it seems. I hope the problem is poor testing but I&#039;m getting more and more sceptical.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Durew, post: 804361, member: 64794"] Glad to know we agree. I still dislike that claim of MB. I'd like to add that this is soley about MBAM along side a main AV. Even the experts on the MBAM are inclined to state that MBAM should be used alongside at least windows defender. This would indeed be the first test aimed at companion AV's that I heard of. Just to be sure, was this test hypothetical or did you actually manage perform it in such short notice? You can count on that. Just FWI, malwarebytes did post a description of what they see a fair test, it is mostly aimed at the anti-exploit component. ([URL="https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/191650-malwarebytes-3-frequently-asked-questions/?tab=comments#comment-1077438"]Malwarebytes 3 - Frequently Asked Questions[/URL]). So it seems. I hope the problem is poor testing but I'm getting more and more sceptical. [/QUOTE]

Verification