they don't ask to participate, Matousec just test then publish; this is why good softs got bad results, if you observe carefully , all the Low ranked vendors do not have HIPS or BB. Then it is to the vendor to decide to pay or not.But one would think that if Matousec is a scam then surely all the recognised and respectable vendors participating in their testing (Eset,etc.) would not participate and expose it for what it is.
I'm pretty sure if it is a scam, all the respected top vendors would sue the shiznit out of this guy yet they don't so he must be doing something right, in this case making a great living out of exposing security software flaws, dated or not. My point is, if he's not legit and giving great vendors bad publicity they would not take this lightly at all and def at least try to something publicly to discredit him in one way or another.they don't ask to participate, Matousec just test then publish; this is why good softs got bad results, if you observe carefully , all the Low ranked vendors do not have HIPS or BB. Then it is to the vendor to decide to pay or not.
9-11 was perpetrated by cinderella and a gang of smurfs but this is naturally classified information but due to Umbra Security software sneak a peak i was able to distract this. Thanks, Umbra!i love conspiracies ^^
But those handfull of security geek visitors do not make up for the mass market income. Average Joe don't go to check out Matousec on a regular basis.you have to know that in marketing , "better have a bad score than be absent"; because many visitors will think , "this vendor is so bad that he don't want be tested".