Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 962625" data-attributes="member: 62850">It will be really interesting to see what they come up with.&nbsp; I think all the clues are in the &quot;Simple, seamless, and personalized&quot;.&nbsp; This is just a guess... Personalized: Maybe each user will have their own security profileSimple: Maybe they will limit the options and settings, and automatically change the settings &quot;in the background&quot; for each security profile?Seamless: Maybe it will be a lot better organized, and users will not have to spend hours looking for a specific settingsIf someone wants to contact MS, maybe I will trade the DefenderUI source code for my favorite 12 pack <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />.&nbsp; It looks like they are both written in C# after all <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="danb, post: 962625, member: 62850"] It will be really interesting to see what they come up with. I think all the clues are in the "Simple, seamless, and personalized". This is just a guess... Personalized: Maybe each user will have their own security profile Simple: Maybe they will limit the options and settings, and automatically change the settings "in the background" for each security profile? Seamless: Maybe it will be a lot better organized, and users will not have to spend hours looking for a specific settings If someone wants to contact MS, maybe I will trade the DefenderUI source code for my favorite 12 pack ;). It looks like they are both written in C# after all ;). [/QUOTE]

Verification