Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Microsoft Defender vs a ransomware Scriptor
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EASTER" data-source="post: 1005337" data-attributes="member: 61725"><p>This little scriptor test and it's classic failure of CFA is given me renewed hope that now i must have to see how if Secure Folders also will fare. I can manufacture a same similar script from bits and pieces and try. As everyone know Secure Folders (driver enforced) is long abandoned by Promosoft who invented it then left it out there on servers for anyone who might find it useful. SF uses ACL's mods/permission restrictions etc and quite frankly if it proves stronger on sciptors in folders/files protected by SF (haven't crossed my mind to try that-Thanks CS) then it's a very poor showing WD is exposing it's user's/customer's and itself to. Side Note: SF is protected my malware zoo collection for years and is still maximum caged those bugs.</p><p></p><p>Another neat video BTW. Always intriguing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EASTER, post: 1005337, member: 61725"] This little scriptor test and it's classic failure of CFA is given me renewed hope that now i must have to see how if Secure Folders also will fare. I can manufacture a same similar script from bits and pieces and try. As everyone know Secure Folders (driver enforced) is long abandoned by Promosoft who invented it then left it out there on servers for anyone who might find it useful. SF uses ACL's mods/permission restrictions etc and quite frankly if it proves stronger on sciptors in folders/files protected by SF (haven't crossed my mind to try that-Thanks CS) then it's a very poor showing WD is exposing it's user's/customer's and itself to. Side Note: SF is protected my malware zoo collection for years and is still maximum caged those bugs. Another neat video BTW. Always intriguing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top