Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Microsoft Defender vs Magniber
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 996574" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>I do not say that is impossible, but I cannot see any evidence for that (from your posts).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The MSI file is blocked for up to 1 minute and the automatic cloud-based analysis + postinfection detections can take even several minutes. So with fully working BAFS, there can be sometimes a several-minute window when the malware can infect the users.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, that can happen with fully working BAFS. The ransomware attack usually uses many different initial samples, so even if one sample would infect only one user, there still can be several infected users with fully working BAFS. Anyway, the BAFS is still efficient if it can prevent one sample from infecting many users.</p><p>In some scenarios, BAFS + postinfection detection will not be efficient for example, when a hacker prepares one sample for one target - there is no gain from BAFS because, after the infection, one infected target is equal to 100% infected victims.</p><p></p><p>By the way how many infected users were confirmed?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 996574, member: 32260"] I do not say that is impossible, but I cannot see any evidence for that (from your posts). The MSI file is blocked for up to 1 minute and the automatic cloud-based analysis + postinfection detections can take even several minutes. So with fully working BAFS, there can be sometimes a several-minute window when the malware can infect the users. Yes, that can happen with fully working BAFS. The ransomware attack usually uses many different initial samples, so even if one sample would infect only one user, there still can be several infected users with fully working BAFS. Anyway, the BAFS is still efficient if it can prevent one sample from infecting many users. In some scenarios, BAFS + postinfection detection will not be efficient for example, when a hacker prepares one sample for one target - there is no gain from BAFS because, after the infection, one infected target is equal to 100% infected victims. By the way how many infected users were confirmed? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top