Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="forgottenuser79643" data-source="post: 993218" data-attributes="member: 88069">I have said this last year, a few posts up, and I still stand by it. Any IT department worth it&#039;s budget would have replaced it by now. In fact, Microsoft has been saying it for years that they don&#039;t recommend Internet Explorer on any level and grandfathered it. If it&#039;s still not replaced inside a business or commits problems... Can only be one of three things: <ol>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">Lazy/terrible IT department;</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">Supervisor(s) blocking change for whatever reasons, if not higher on the chain;</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">Or budget cuts to the point that the &quot;department&quot; itself can&#039;t even be considered bare-bones anymore...</li>
</ol>Either way, it&#039;s negligence of the highest order. And Ironic enough, I still see a lot of mentions that the switch is problematic for some businesses. And you had what? Close to 6-7 years by now to figure it out.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="forgottenuser79643, post: 993218, member: 88069"] I have said this last year, a few posts up, and I still stand by it. Any IT department worth it's budget would have replaced it by now. In fact, Microsoft has been saying it for years that they don't recommend Internet Explorer on any level and grandfathered it. If it's still not replaced inside a business or commits problems... Can only be one of three things: [LIST=1] [*]Lazy/terrible IT department; [*]Supervisor(s) blocking change for whatever reasons, if not higher on the chain; [*]Or budget cuts to the point that the "department" itself can't even be considered bare-bones anymore... [/LIST] Either way, it's negligence of the highest order. And Ironic enough, I still see a lot of mentions that the switch is problematic for some businesses. And you had what? Close to 6-7 years by now to figure it out. [/QUOTE]

Verification