- Oct 2, 2020
- 463
This my security configuration for 2024. I most likely won't change it much as I didn't in 2023.
Love the simplicity, but I just don't feel ready to do the same yet.This my security configuration for 2024. I most likely won't change it much as I didn't in 2023.
Thank you for your suggestion. I will give it a try.Love the simplicity, but I just don't feel ready to do the same yet.
Just one thing you might want to change. HitmanPro's developement stagnated in the last few years, and it really isn't effective against all kinds of malicious scripts.
You might want to try X-Sec as the developer @xywcloud is a MalwareTips member, and as the product is quite effective: X-Sec Antivirus
Eset Nod32 Antivirus is great and should have lower performance impact then defender while having better detection , preventionI updated info about my configuration for beginning of 2025. I did not make much changes in 2024 and I also don't have a plan to change much in 2025.
I haven't tested how my system performs while using Defender for a long time now, but the last time I compared them Eset had lower impact on performance. Especially when performing file related operations Defender had quite an impact on performance. Yes, performance wise experience with Eset is excellent and I also like how I rarely get any false positive.Eset Nod32 Antivirus is great and should have lower performance impact then defender while having better detection , prevention
Your machine has great specs too so I'm certain you have a great experience
Yes it has lower false positive rate as wellI haven't tested how my system performs while using Defender for a long time now, but the last time I compared them Eset had lower impact on performance. Especially when performing file related operations Defender had quite an impact on performance. Yes, performance wise experience with Eset is excellent and I also like how I rarely get any false positive.
Personally I don't miss those options very much. I prefer to use just basic anti-malware features. That's why I use AV instead of IS even though I bought license for IS.Yes it has lower false positive rate as well
Only thing I dislike is that the liveguard version is too expansive and that one feature I use on eset endpoint advanced called ransomware remediation is still only available for business clients
It was light most of the time. For me problems with slow performance were only with file related operations - backup speed and similar. At the time it seemed that Defender didn't have good "whitelisting" system and it would scan same data each time it was accessed, making the process of copying data slower. Maybe they improved that part of protection in past few years...You can still tweak some stuff in defender to reduce it's performance usage and defender is lighter then some av software anyway and in most machines should be alright
And with your specs defender will be light
Indeed, copying volumes of files has always been an issue for Defender. If they were going to change things, they would have done it by now. Oh well ....For me problems with slow performance were only with file related operations - backup speed and similar. At the time it seemed that Defender didn't have good "whitelisting" system and it would scan same data each time it was accessed, making the process of copying data slower.
It's not even copying/moving, just browsing folders with lots of file will slow down system with defender.Indeed, copying volumes of files has always been an issue for Defender. If they were going to change things, they would have done it by now. Oh well ....
Seeing that I rarely do this its not an issue for me.It's not even copying/moving, just browsing folders with lots of file will slow down system with defender.
Same here.Seeing that I rarely do this its not an issue for me.