Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
MRG Effitas 360 Assessment & Certification – Q1 2019
Message
<blockquote data-quote="a1nn" data-source="post: 815753" data-attributes="member: 63016"><p>The two tests used different samples; the banking test used 15 ITW samples that were clones of very prevalent financial malware.</p><p></p><p></p><p>In the case of this test, they used essentially zero-day URL samples of which 119 happened to be financial malware.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If you're talking about the botnet test in the banking test, then that was purely a test of behavioral or heuristic detection. They used a hand-modified TinyNuke sample.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="a1nn, post: 815753, member: 63016"] The two tests used different samples; the banking test used 15 ITW samples that were clones of very prevalent financial malware. In the case of this test, they used essentially zero-day URL samples of which 119 happened to be financial malware. If you're talking about the botnet test in the banking test, then that was purely a test of behavioral or heuristic detection. They used a hand-modified TinyNuke sample. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
