Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Battlefield
Software Comparison
Need Help Choosing Between Three AVs
Message
<blockquote data-quote="a090" data-source="post: 1032459" data-attributes="member: 99949"><p>Thanks for the reply mate. And Vote 1 for Emsisoft. Will tally ‘em all up.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Great points made here. It’s true that I can fire up VirtualBox and have a go at answering some of these questions myself, but the truth is I have neither the time nor the desire. The latter is more important. If I had the desire, naturally I would find a way to make the time. There was a time in my life where I was interested in, and also did, what you’re describing. I’ve spent hundreds of hours in middle and high school testing out various AVs. I remember when Avast’s logo in the taskbar was an orange ball that spun every time the product initiated a scan, and an orange amoeba looking thing as the main logo. I remember when ESET used to put out (goofy) videos of a white and blue robot destroying shadow monsters (viruses). And when G-DATA used to use Avast + BitDefender, and a lesser known company TrustPort used three engines—AVG, BitDefender, and their own. When Emsisoft had separate products for AV and firewall. Even used Online Armor with Avast for a while, then switched to the Avast + Comodo firewall combo that was popular at the time.</p><p></p><p>And so on…been there, done that. That was years ago. Not interested in doing all of that testing again. Products are now more complex and there are better folks than me doing the testing. I have some defined criteria that I’ve indirectly outlined above by mentioning my likes / dislikes with the various products and I’m sticking to those to settle on one product. Mainly, I’m looking for stability, reliable security (doesn’t have to be the most agressive but it should be a top tier product), privacy-respecting (means different things to different people but F-Secure comes to mind as a good example), and financially sound. Emsisoft checks all of the boxes but the company looks like it’s not doing so well. And I’m not interested in jumping on a sinking ship.</p><p></p><p>Completely agree about the AV becoming a lump. But that’s fine because I’d rather have a different lump than Microsoft Defender. It has treated me well. Never been infected using it, but it has also never thrown an alert because I’m extremely cautious with my opsec. I don’t click any links if I know how to get there by searching manually (period). I never open unwarranted attachments. I don’t pirate or visit naughty websites, at least not on my main rig. I block all ads using custom and public lists. I have beefed up Defender to the nth degree using Group Policy and ran periodic scans with Malwarebytes, EEK, HitmanPro, ESET Online Scanner, NPE, etc. All clean. So my desire for a third-party AV is just that. A desire, likely an irrational one. And I’m going to fulfill it.</p><p></p><p>Hardening Windows is a great idea and something I’ve dabbled in. I’m quite familiar with Group Policy and have used it to beef up W11 quite a bit. I’ve gone through every setting in GPO regarding Windows components (yes, no joke… took me over an hour) and have tweaked things from disabling autoruns and autoplay to turning on network protection and boosting exploit protections, and everything in between. I’ve boosted cloud protection, enabled BAFS, and much much more.</p><p></p><p>If you have a list of GPO settings you apply, or a list of the various tweaks you do to harden up, please let me know. All ears. My only request is to not recommend software. I enjoy tweaking things myself, and took up the task of applying 80% of [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER] ‘s Hardening to Microsoft Defender manually in GPO with ASR rules and other protections. The other 20% I couldn’t do (such as get a right-click RunBySmartscreen and other minor miscellaneous stuff). And I was cool with it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Appreciate the reply! Please see comment above on why I’m not keen on testing things out again myself. But I’m all for Windows hardening and know my way around Group Policy. Any specific hardening tweaks you recommend? Manual tweaks please, I don’t like using utilities to do the tweaks for us. I’ve done a lot of [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER] ‘s Defender tweaks manually in GPO using MS docs.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Never heard of FFRI but I’ll look into it. Cylance I’ve heard of but thought it was corporate. Didn’t know you could buy home licenses. And Vote 1 for Kaspersky, thanks!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Vote 2 for Kaspersky. Thanks!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ah the infamous Shadowra. It’s your videos that put me into this mess, mate. You’ve tested all of these products and they all looked solid and made it difficult to pick one. Jokes aside, your vids are great. Appreciate the obvious time and effort put into them.</p><p></p><p>Since you recommended F-Secure, do you know if they beefed up tamper and self protection? Is it still possible to end F-Secure processes in task manager, or delete files from the F-Secure folders? Most AVs protect against that but F-Secure historically didn’t. Curious if that has changed.</p><p></p><p>Also, should I disable any Windows security features such ad Memory Integrity / Core Isolation before install? I know Kaspersky doesn’t like it but what about F-Secure? Currently have it disabled but I can easily go into BIOS, enable SVM, and then go into Windows Security and flip on Memory Integrity.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thanks for the comment lol. But these days, even non-Pentagon employees need to be careful. Especially with the escalating tensions on both sides.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Great reply! And thanks for answering regarding browser certificate. So if I install something like AdGuard for desktop that does scan HTTPS, it shouldn’t conflict with F-Secure’s browsing protection? I know some HTTPS-scanning products like ESET have had issues historically with Adguard, so I’m trying to avoid that. I want F-Secure to scan HTTPS traffic, but without using a cert or interfering with Adguard’s certs / process.</p><p></p><p>I have used Trend Micro in the past and while it was, and presumably still is, a good product, it’s still in the Dr.Web and VIPRE camp for me. Not as well-known here in the west.</p><p></p><p>Sophos looks interesting though. I’ve heard of them before and know they own HitmanPro these days. Sad what they did with Sandboxie so that left a bad taste in my mouth. But definitely interested in your testing of SHP. Thanks again.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Vote 2 for F-Secure. Thanks for the reply! The moral part doesn’t factor into my decision because the same could be said about US IT companies when America invaded the Middle East and killed millions. For some good reasons but many bad. But nobody said buying from a western IT company was fueling the war, even though our tech sector is heavily tied to NSA, CISA, and so on. And I say all this as a proud American myself.</p><p></p><p>So I rule out that argument as a double-standard against Kaspersky because it’s Russian. But the security aspect you mentioned is a real threat. Completely agree. My only concern is finding out if there is any actual reason to worry about them even with most of their infrastructure in Switzerland and Canada for US users. Other folks can debate the war but I’m staying out of it. I’m leaning towards F-Secure already but open to alternatives.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="a090, post: 1032459, member: 99949"] Thanks for the reply mate. And Vote 1 for Emsisoft. Will tally ‘em all up. Great points made here. It’s true that I can fire up VirtualBox and have a go at answering some of these questions myself, but the truth is I have neither the time nor the desire. The latter is more important. If I had the desire, naturally I would find a way to make the time. There was a time in my life where I was interested in, and also did, what you’re describing. I’ve spent hundreds of hours in middle and high school testing out various AVs. I remember when Avast’s logo in the taskbar was an orange ball that spun every time the product initiated a scan, and an orange amoeba looking thing as the main logo. I remember when ESET used to put out (goofy) videos of a white and blue robot destroying shadow monsters (viruses). And when G-DATA used to use Avast + BitDefender, and a lesser known company TrustPort used three engines—AVG, BitDefender, and their own. When Emsisoft had separate products for AV and firewall. Even used Online Armor with Avast for a while, then switched to the Avast + Comodo firewall combo that was popular at the time. And so on…been there, done that. That was years ago. Not interested in doing all of that testing again. Products are now more complex and there are better folks than me doing the testing. I have some defined criteria that I’ve indirectly outlined above by mentioning my likes / dislikes with the various products and I’m sticking to those to settle on one product. Mainly, I’m looking for stability, reliable security (doesn’t have to be the most agressive but it should be a top tier product), privacy-respecting (means different things to different people but F-Secure comes to mind as a good example), and financially sound. Emsisoft checks all of the boxes but the company looks like it’s not doing so well. And I’m not interested in jumping on a sinking ship. Completely agree about the AV becoming a lump. But that’s fine because I’d rather have a different lump than Microsoft Defender. It has treated me well. Never been infected using it, but it has also never thrown an alert because I’m extremely cautious with my opsec. I don’t click any links if I know how to get there by searching manually (period). I never open unwarranted attachments. I don’t pirate or visit naughty websites, at least not on my main rig. I block all ads using custom and public lists. I have beefed up Defender to the nth degree using Group Policy and ran periodic scans with Malwarebytes, EEK, HitmanPro, ESET Online Scanner, NPE, etc. All clean. So my desire for a third-party AV is just that. A desire, likely an irrational one. And I’m going to fulfill it. Hardening Windows is a great idea and something I’ve dabbled in. I’m quite familiar with Group Policy and have used it to beef up W11 quite a bit. I’ve gone through every setting in GPO regarding Windows components (yes, no joke… took me over an hour) and have tweaked things from disabling autoruns and autoplay to turning on network protection and boosting exploit protections, and everything in between. I’ve boosted cloud protection, enabled BAFS, and much much more. If you have a list of GPO settings you apply, or a list of the various tweaks you do to harden up, please let me know. All ears. My only request is to not recommend software. I enjoy tweaking things myself, and took up the task of applying 80% of [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER] ‘s Hardening to Microsoft Defender manually in GPO with ASR rules and other protections. The other 20% I couldn’t do (such as get a right-click RunBySmartscreen and other minor miscellaneous stuff). And I was cool with it. Appreciate the reply! Please see comment above on why I’m not keen on testing things out again myself. But I’m all for Windows hardening and know my way around Group Policy. Any specific hardening tweaks you recommend? Manual tweaks please, I don’t like using utilities to do the tweaks for us. I’ve done a lot of [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER] ‘s Defender tweaks manually in GPO using MS docs. Never heard of FFRI but I’ll look into it. Cylance I’ve heard of but thought it was corporate. Didn’t know you could buy home licenses. And Vote 1 for Kaspersky, thanks! Vote 2 for Kaspersky. Thanks! Ah the infamous Shadowra. It’s your videos that put me into this mess, mate. You’ve tested all of these products and they all looked solid and made it difficult to pick one. Jokes aside, your vids are great. Appreciate the obvious time and effort put into them. Since you recommended F-Secure, do you know if they beefed up tamper and self protection? Is it still possible to end F-Secure processes in task manager, or delete files from the F-Secure folders? Most AVs protect against that but F-Secure historically didn’t. Curious if that has changed. Also, should I disable any Windows security features such ad Memory Integrity / Core Isolation before install? I know Kaspersky doesn’t like it but what about F-Secure? Currently have it disabled but I can easily go into BIOS, enable SVM, and then go into Windows Security and flip on Memory Integrity. Thanks for the comment lol. But these days, even non-Pentagon employees need to be careful. Especially with the escalating tensions on both sides. Great reply! And thanks for answering regarding browser certificate. So if I install something like AdGuard for desktop that does scan HTTPS, it shouldn’t conflict with F-Secure’s browsing protection? I know some HTTPS-scanning products like ESET have had issues historically with Adguard, so I’m trying to avoid that. I want F-Secure to scan HTTPS traffic, but without using a cert or interfering with Adguard’s certs / process. I have used Trend Micro in the past and while it was, and presumably still is, a good product, it’s still in the Dr.Web and VIPRE camp for me. Not as well-known here in the west. Sophos looks interesting though. I’ve heard of them before and know they own HitmanPro these days. Sad what they did with Sandboxie so that left a bad taste in my mouth. But definitely interested in your testing of SHP. Thanks again. Vote 2 for F-Secure. Thanks for the reply! The moral part doesn’t factor into my decision because the same could be said about US IT companies when America invaded the Middle East and killed millions. For some good reasons but many bad. But nobody said buying from a western IT company was fueling the war, even though our tech sector is heavily tied to NSA, CISA, and so on. And I say all this as a proud American myself. So I rule out that argument as a double-standard against Kaspersky because it’s Russian. But the security aspect you mentioned is a real threat. Completely agree. My only concern is finding out if there is any actual reason to worry about them even with most of their infrastructure in Switzerland and Canada for US users. Other folks can debate the war but I’m staying out of it. I’m leaning towards F-Secure already but open to alternatives. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top