Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
General Apps
VM and Remote Access
Network adapter Q? re isolation
Message
<blockquote data-quote="simmerskool" data-source="post: 1055932" data-attributes="member: 61091"><p>update to above re fixing the VM connection: above weblink very helpful for me -- item 6) on that page if Bridged change to NAT, or visa versa. I was Bridged and changed to NAT and I now have the VM connection back <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite116" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> VMw_link also suggests reinstalling VMware to correct any anomalies, (see my post #1 above). Have not reinstalled VM 16.2.5 yet, and still network adapter is NAT, had run it Bridged the past several months (not sure it will connect if set to Bridged) In the meantime, which network adapter setting provides the best or optimal isolation between the Host and Guest? Bridged, NAT or other, if other please delineate, or provide link. I may have known this, but I forget... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite118" alt=":oops:" title="Oops! :oops:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":oops:" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite119" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></p><p></p><p>EDIT so after following url link steps 6 7 & 8, I switched back to Bridged (automatic) and now Bridged <u><strong>is</strong></u> WORKING. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite116" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite138" alt=":geek:" title="Geek :geek:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":geek:" /></p><p>but still the question, for best isolation, bridged, nat or other... thanks</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="simmerskool, post: 1055932, member: 61091"] update to above re fixing the VM connection: above weblink very helpful for me -- item 6) on that page if Bridged change to NAT, or visa versa. I was Bridged and changed to NAT and I now have the VM connection back :D VMw_link also suggests reinstalling VMware to correct any anomalies, (see my post #1 above). Have not reinstalled VM 16.2.5 yet, and still network adapter is NAT, had run it Bridged the past several months (not sure it will connect if set to Bridged) In the meantime, which network adapter setting provides the best or optimal isolation between the Host and Guest? Bridged, NAT or other, if other please delineate, or provide link. I may have known this, but I forget... :oops::rolleyes: EDIT so after following url link steps 6 7 & 8, I switched back to Bridged (automatic) and now Bridged [U][B]is[/B][/U] WORKING. :D:geek: but still the question, for best isolation, bridged, nat or other... thanks [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top