New comprehensive test
- Thread starter Lindrian
- Start date
McLovin said:Lindrian said:
Oh, okay. Hope everything goes okay for you
I can try to test the software without recording it, that will go MUCH faster and just publish a pdf file, if people feel that is ok.
eXPerience
Level 1
- Mar 7, 2011
- 248
Ok honestly, I do have my doubts. I'm happy with the idea, but I have some questions.
1) some products use the cloud, so cutting the internet connection will not test the products real detection capabilities.
2) how do you separate the real malware from false positives ?
3) although I'm happy you test 64 bit, some products could've different results under 32 bit (sandboxing and stuff)
4) speaking of sandboxing, considering that the malware runs in a sandbox but will appear on task manager --> pass or not ?
5) how are you planning on reacting to pop-ups ? Paranoid - advanced user - newbie - ...
thanks and good luck,
eXp
1) some products use the cloud, so cutting the internet connection will not test the products real detection capabilities.
2) how do you separate the real malware from false positives ?
3) although I'm happy you test 64 bit, some products could've different results under 32 bit (sandboxing and stuff)
4) speaking of sandboxing, considering that the malware runs in a sandbox but will appear on task manager --> pass or not ?
5) how are you planning on reacting to pop-ups ? Paranoid - advanced user - newbie - ...
thanks and good luck,
eXp
pcjunklist
Level 1
- Dec 28, 2011
- 523
you could start with the program, i believe it's the same thing you are working on.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/malwareautodown/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/malwareautodown/
Similar threads
