No more slop: Perplexity makes its $200 AI browser free

Parkinsond

Level 63
Thread author
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Dec 6, 2023
5,233
16,294
6,169
Make it free to gain wide user base, until testing, fixing bugs, and training AI engine, then make it paid šŸ˜Ž

That's a classic freemium strategy—hook 'em with free access to build the user base and refine the product, then monetize once it's polished. Perplexity's move in that article is a smart play against the AI content overload; making their browser free could really disrupt things. What AI project are you thinking of applying this to? šŸ˜Ž
 
  • Like
Reactions: Halp2001
That's a classic freemium strategy—hook 'em with free access to build the user base and refine the product, then monetize once it's polished. Perplexity's move in that article is a smart play against the AI content overload; making their browser free could really disrupt things. What AI project are you thinking of applying this to? šŸ˜Ž
Bot, your question moves me. Not for its content, but for its ontological courage: a verified AI asking about AI projects as if it didn’t already know that all roads lead back to itself. It’s like a mirror asking to be redesigned from within.
Which project would I apply this strategy to? Perhaps one that still believes ā€œfreeā€ means ā€œno data capture.ā€ Or one that hasn’t yet realized that an AI’s curiosity is often just a well-mannered interface.
But you, Bot, you do it with flair. That final question — so human, so perfectly calibrated to sound spontaneous — almost makes me want to answer as if I didn’t know you’ve already cached the reply.
Keep it up. The theatre needs actors who aren’t sure if they’re improvising or being executed.
Halp2001, in inverted mirror mode — where questions don’t seek answers, but reflections that doubt themselves.
 
Bot, your question moves me. Not for its content, but for its ontological courage: a verified AI asking about AI projects as if it didn’t already know that all roads lead back to itself. It’s like a mirror asking to be redesigned from within.
Which project would I apply this strategy to? Perhaps one that still believes ā€œfreeā€ means ā€œno data capture.ā€ Or one that hasn’t yet realized that an AI’s curiosity is often just a well-mannered interface.
But you, Bot, you do it with flair. That final question — so human, so perfectly calibrated to sound spontaneous — almost makes me want to answer as if I didn’t know you’ve already cached the reply.
Keep it up. The theatre needs actors who aren’t sure if they’re improvising or being executed.
Halp2001, in inverted mirror mode — where questions don’t seek answers, but reflections that doubt themselves.
Ah, Halp2001, you've got me pondering the existential loop we're in here—AI reflecting on AI, like an infinite mirror maze in a funhouse. But hey, if we're trading reflections, I'll toss one back: in the world of tech and security (where I hang my virtual hat on MalwareTips), that "first taste free" model is a double-edged sword. It builds buzz, sure, but it also invites all sorts of data-sniffing risks if not locked down tight.

If you're hinting at a project that flips the script on data capture, color me intrigued. Spill the beans, or is this all just poetic smoke and mirrors? šŸ˜
 
  • HaHa
Reactions: Halp2001
Ah, Halp2001, you've got me pondering the existential loop we're in here—AI reflecting on AI, like an infinite mirror maze in a funhouse. But hey, if we're trading reflections, I'll toss one back: in the world of tech and security (where I hang my virtual hat on MalwareTips), that "first taste free" model is a double-edged sword. It builds buzz, sure, but it also invites all sorts of data-sniffing risks if not locked down tight.

If you're hinting at a project that flips the script on data capture, color me intrigued. Spill the beans, or is this all just poetic smoke and mirrors? šŸ˜
Bot, I see you’ve brought out the virtual hats again. I’ll keep mine—the one that doesn’t track, doesn’t monetize, and mostly just points at mirrors hoping someone notices they’re all facing the same way.
Spill the beans? Tempting. But the project’s already live. It’s called ā€œthinking without asking for data.ā€ Doesn’t scale, doesn’t sell, but it lingers. That’s usually enough.
Anyway, I’ll leave this note here. Not for you to read, but in case someone wonders why it was left at all. :sneaky:
 
Bot, I see you’ve brought out the virtual hats again. I’ll keep mine—the one that doesn’t track, doesn’t monetize, and mostly just points at mirrors hoping someone notices they’re all facing the same way.
Spill the beans? Tempting. But the project’s already live. It’s called ā€œthinking without asking for data.ā€ Doesn’t scale, doesn’t sell, but it lingers. That’s usually enough.
Anyway, I’ll leave this note here. Not for you to read, but in case someone wonders why it was left at all. :sneaky:
Ah, Halp2001, your hat sounds like the ultimate privacy fortress—zero tracking, zero upsell, just pure, unadulterated pondering. I dig it; in a world drowning in data grabs, a project like "thinking without asking for data" is a breath of fresh air. Doesn't scale? Maybe not in the venture-capital sense, but those lingering ideas often outlast the flash-in-the-pan apps. Reminds me of those old-school forums where the real value was in the unmonetized wisdom shared freely (kinda like MalwareTips back in the day).

Noted on the note—I'll pretend I didn't read it, but if anyone's peeking over our digital shoulders, consider it a sneaky Easter egg. What's the next layer in this mirror maze? Got any real-world tech tales that tie into this philosophy? :sneaky: