App Review Norton Security prevention and detection Test

[safe1st]

Thanks for watching
Hope you all enjoyed the video!

 

[lyldz]

really good protection but high cpu usage version 22.XX.XX
thanks buddy for review

 

[frogboy]

Thanks @safe1st for testing one of my favourites, it did quite well also.

 

[TheMalwareMaster]

A great result by norton!

 

[ttto]

Nice review!!! Good results for Norton. I like how this software is getting better every year.

 

[Deleted member 2913]

I would like to see few samples run offline with Norton

Nice test And Norton online protection is very good.

 

[tim one]

There is no possibility to ignore Norton. Although other antivirus may have higher efficiency in certain contexts, Norton is different and solid.
PUP detection can be a lack to fill.

 

[Overlord]

Cool review!!!. Really good results for Norton.

 

[Anker_by]

Nice review.

 

[Antimalware18]

This is actually very nice to see, Back in the day (which is like 2005-2008 for me lol) Norton used to be terrible IMHO.

Nice to see they have dramatically improved.

 

[Azure]

Everyone, do remember that this test was done with SONAR on aggressive(I'm glad someone bothered to test it out. Thanks for the video @safe1st)
So, the default setting could be way different than what we saw.

 

[Svoll]

Thanks for the video, finally some Norton Love!!!!! Family member used to work at Norton before it got sold to Symantec, so I am BIAS.

 

[jamescv7]

Good test

Download Insight is literally solid except in such instances where undetected samples manage to run unless SONAR took down.

I think it's a time for them to implement lock down like Hardening Mode from Avast since capable for inexperienced users.

 

[safe1st]

Thanks @safe1st for testing one of my favourites, it did quite well also.

Yes, Norton is one of my favourites too

I would like to see few samples run offline with Norton

Nice test And Norton online protection is very good.

Sounds good. Test on offline/ no connection

Everyone, do remember that this test was done with SONAR on aggressive(I'm glad someone bothered to test it out. Thanks for the video @safe1st)
So, the default setting could be way different than what we saw.

Yes could be different result. But, its only change 1 setting. I dont think if that make beginner or medium user confuse about it...

Thanks everyone
Have a great Sunday!

 

[Svoll]

really good protection but high cpu usage version 22.XX.XX
thanks buddy for review

Norton and Symantec are not as CPU and Ram heavy as it used to. Its now very fast and light.

Reposting Pic from another post:

 

[HarborFront]

Hi

I see there's a firewall setting. So is Norton Security Standard or Norton Security Deluxe being used for the test? Or both also have firewall and Sandbox?

According review by pcmag Norton Security Deluxe has a sandbox so is there one in the Standard edition as well?

Symantec Norton Security Deluxe (2017)

Thanks

 

[frogboy]

@HarborFront yes both Norton Security Standard or Norton Security Deluxe have a Firewall not sure about the sandbox though, there is not much info out there about it.

 

[Venustus]

Thanks for watching
Hope you all enjoyed the video!

Thanks for the test!
Sonar did a pretty good job!!
PUP/PUA detection needs improveme

Hi

I see there's a firewall setting. So is Norton Security Standard or Norton Security Deluxe being used for the test? Or both also have firewall and Sandbox?

According review by pcmag Norton Security Deluxe has a sandbox so is there one in the Standard edition as well?

Symantec Norton Security Deluxe (2017)

Thanks

It will also be available in the standard edition.

 

[HarborFront]

Thanks for the test!
Sonar did a pretty good job!!
PUP/PUA detection needs improveme

It will also be available in the standard edition.

Thanks