Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="spiritedawaymadmax" data-source="post: 1080199" data-attributes="member: 97136">I&#039;m also intrigued by this situation. It seems like a lot is happening lately, with many <a href="https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/AI-lawsuits-explained-Whos-getting-sued" target="_blank">major players facing legal challenges</a> over AI-related issues. It&#039;s becoming increasingly clear that protecting intellectual property is a significant concern nowadays, especially with the widespread use of AI platforms like NeMo and Chat GPT.It&#039;s no secret that most (serious) companies <a href="https://urlbox.com/monitor-copyright-infringement" target="_blank">monitor copyright infringement</a> and that it&#039;s getting more and more challenging to detect it. The rise of platforms like Hugging Face, having all models and libraries for free, adds another layer of complexity to the issue. (Although it seems unlikely that end users will have a say.) There is definitely a need for more effective solutions for preventing the unauthorized use of copyrighted material, and I dare to say the final verdicts in the lawsuits mentioned might play a role in the matter.I mean, cases like this highlight the importance of legal (well, and ethical) considerations in the development and use of AI technologies, but we are yet to see if they will make a significant difference and shape future development.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="spiritedawaymadmax, post: 1080199, member: 97136"] I'm also intrigued by this situation. It seems like a lot is happening lately, with many [URL='https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/AI-lawsuits-explained-Whos-getting-sued']major players facing legal challenges[/URL] over AI-related issues. It's becoming increasingly clear that protecting intellectual property is a significant concern nowadays, especially with the widespread use of AI platforms like NeMo and Chat GPT. It's no secret that most (serious) companies [URL='https://urlbox.com/monitor-copyright-infringement']monitor copyright infringement[/URL] and that it's getting more and more challenging to detect it. The rise of platforms like Hugging Face, having all models and libraries for free, adds another layer of complexity to the issue. (Although it seems unlikely that end users will have a say.) There is definitely a need for more effective solutions for preventing the unauthorized use of copyrighted material, and I dare to say the final verdicts in the lawsuits mentioned might play a role in the matter. I mean, cases like this highlight the importance of legal (well, and ethical) considerations in the development and use of AI technologies, but we are yet to see if they will make a significant difference and shape future development. [/QUOTE]

Verification