Battle Online Armor Firewall or Comodo Firewall

[Nathan Wootton]

wich one and why?

 

[win7holic]

Comodo Firewall for more details.
and, OA not much details.

So, I vote for Comodo Firewall.

 

[Deleted member 178]

i used OA premium before for long time, but now i will choose Comodo Firewall because it has more features (sandbox), fully (or almost) x64, silent modes, ultra light.

the main feature i like in OA is the network monitor where you can lookup the IP adress, but most of the useful features are for the premium version.

i did a review of OAP here: http://malwaretips.com/Thread-Emsisoft-Anti-Malware-6-Online-Armor-Premium-5-combo

 

[Nathan Wootton]

thanks for the review

 

[Deleted member 178]

no problem, so which one did you choose?

 

[AyeAyeCaptain]

i used OA premium before for long time, but now i will choose Comodo Firewall because it has more features (sandbox), fully (or almost) x64, silent modes, ultra light.

the main feature i like in OA is the network monitor where you can lookup the IP adress, but most of the useful features are for the premium version.

i did a review of OAP here: http://malwaretips.com/Thread-Emsisoft-Anti-Malware-6-Online-Armor-Premium-5-combo

Can't really add to that but totally agree with what you said on Comodo, not tried OA in a long time so can't comment, but has inspired me to give it a go now I have recently installed VMWARE..

Due to the sandbox feature (can't wait for v6... just keeps on improving!) it's a no brainer, what did you choose then also out of interest...?

 

[Nathan Wootton]

i really like OAP but comodo seems just a little lighter Doing a few days testing in Vm before i change

 

[imsoadude]

last time i used OA i found it kind of heavy on my system compared to comodo but i also find the interface of comodo easier to use than OA. sometimes i found comodo more complex than OA.

 

[Deleted member 178]

OA is heavier than comodo that is sure, i can confirm it.

 

[jamescv7]

I would choose Comodo Firewall.

Even from the older version before, Comodo Firewall made a stable performance in my system unlike Online Armor from wizard it freezes a lot and cannot handle the situation.

 

[Deleted member 178]

the wizard is quite annoying if you know that your system is safe, it still scan all files.

 

[jota13]

I think both software's are good. But I prefer Comodo Firewall. Especially when in system is another HIPS like Zemana AntiLogger or Spy Shelter (Free or Premium).

 

[Devial]

Comodo all the way

 

[davids]

I use OA. I don't think its heavy.I am using it since last one year and it works just fine for me.

 

[Lukajlo]

I am Comodo member for a long time and I think that Comodo Firewall is great but one big minus, its not compatible with Kaspersky AV (didnt try Online Armor with KAV).

 

[Linuxfever]

Both products are good however Comodo auto-sandbox is enabled by default and it will drastically reduce the number of alerts that a user may encounter.The alerts are more easy to understand with Comodo so my choice is Comodo Firewall.

 

[illumination]

I prefer Comodo Firewall of the two, it is lighter on my system, and love the control!

 

[GabiCRX]

I prefer Comodo, it's free, easy to use, friendly with the PC resources, and a 5 stars protection !

 

[jota13]

I changed my opinion, because Comodo Firewall is better than Online Armor Premium only when you haven't another software to protect your PC, for example when you have HIPS like Spy Shelter.

When I turned on protection in the Comodo Firewall my computer worked slowly, because probably was conflict with Spy Shelter Premium.

And now, since I installed Online Armor Premium everything works well.

Online Armor is better than Comodo Personal Firewall.

 

[Deleted member 178]

Anyway using two HIPS and Firewall in same time is useless...Spyshelter, CIS or OAP are not designed to work with each other...