- Jan 27, 2013
- 661
Palemoon to remove google search.
- Thread starter Amiga500
- Start date
- Status
- Oct 2, 2014
- 805
Google wants the whole market for itself, all other browsers are an issue for them; including Pale Moon. The less browsers outhere, the more income for them.
- Jan 27, 2013
- 661
As moonchild stated google thinks palemoon traffic is invalid.
I say this..palemoon is the best damn browser i have used on linux .
way to go moonchild.
I say this..palemoon is the best damn browser i have used on linux .
way to go moonchild.
- Aug 30, 2015
- 1,928
I don't really understand using other browser clones. Majority of them are out of date clones that can be exploited. Didn't really find any other browser faster than Chrome.
- Mar 1, 2014
- 1,708
Pale Moon now is a complete fork. It's now based on Goanna engine, a complete fork of Gecko engine. You cannot now completely compare Pale Moon with Firefox (or with Firefox "clones") due to that, and so "out of date" is inapplicable. You can say that Pale Moon is a wholly different browser.
As for the topic, Moonchild expressed in the forums that there has been a misunderstanding between Google team and his team. And so, changes have to be made.
- Oct 2, 2014
- 805
Actually, most mainstream browsers are more of a target than non mainstream browsers, so do not expect that "Clones can be exploited" to be a gold rule. Pale Moon is not outdated by any means, it offers many good stuff for people who need them, if you are confortable with Chrome thats great, but not everyone picks Chrome, not everyone picks Firefox, some picks what works better for them. There may be clones bloated and outdated browsers outhere that may damage your computer. Pale Moon is not one of them.
- Jan 26, 2015
- 160
good for them. duckduckgo is better anyway.
go pale moon!
go pale moon!
- Status
Similar threads
