Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Testing
Malware Hub: Statistics and Reports
Panda Dome Free 18 - December 2018 Report
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vertigo" data-source="post: 795585" data-attributes="member: 70928"><p>I've tested OSA and SysHardener a bit. I realize SH is lower resources because it's a tweaker (vaccine) vs always running like OSA, though OSA seems to be pretty light anyways. I prefer OSA because it's less involved and it's interactive, and SH is still fairly new and perhaps not quite ready for use by the "masses" as it may still break some stuff. So I'm curious why you guys choose one or the other, why SH was used here instead of OSA, if OSA would do better than SH (some comments seem to indicate it's better), and if a test could be done using it instead to see if Panda provides acceptable results, because there were an awful lot of infections in this one despite having it combined with SH.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vertigo, post: 795585, member: 70928"] I've tested OSA and SysHardener a bit. I realize SH is lower resources because it's a tweaker (vaccine) vs always running like OSA, though OSA seems to be pretty light anyways. I prefer OSA because it's less involved and it's interactive, and SH is still fairly new and perhaps not quite ready for use by the "masses" as it may still break some stuff. So I'm curious why you guys choose one or the other, why SH was used here instead of OSA, if OSA would do better than SH (some comments seem to indicate it's better), and if a test could be done using it instead to see if Panda provides acceptable results, because there were an awful lot of infections in this one despite having it combined with SH. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top