Panda Dome Premium - October 2018 Report

[harlan4096]

Panda Dome Premium 18 - October 2018 Report

Due to the small number of samples used in this tests, you should take results with a grain of salt. We encourage you to compare these results with others and take informed decisions on what security products to use.

Spoiler: FINAL STATISTICS OF THE MONTH:

Total Samples: 198 (100%)
Total Static Detections: 54 (27,27)
Total Dynamic Detections/Blocked*: 103 (52'02%) (* Application Control Enabled + NVT OSA)
Total Not Detected/Missed: 41 (20,70%)
Total Detected/Blocked: 157 (79,29%)

Total samples pack: 19
Total samples pack been tested: 19
Total final status of the system (clean): 4
Total final status of the system (protected): 15
Total final status of the system (infected): 1 (+3)
Total final status of the system (encrypted): 1

* Dynamic BB Bonus Test (PD resident AV module disabled + Application Control disabled + NVT OSA disabled)

October 2018	Samples Pack	Static Detection	Dynamic Detection	Total Detection	Bait Files Encrypted	2nd Opinion Scanners	System Final Status	Thread Link
01/10/2018​	19​	8 / 19​	7 / 11​	15 / 19​	No​	Infected​	Infected​	Post#7​
NEXT ​	RESULTS​	PERFORMED​	WITH ​	PDP​	+​	NVT OSA:​	​	​
03/10/2017​	15​	4 / 15​	5 (PDAC) + 6 (OSA) / 11​	15 / 15​	No​	Not Clean​	Protected​	Post#6​
05/10/2018​	9​	2 / 9​	2 (PDAC) + 4 (OSA) / 7​	8 / 9​	No​	All Clean​	Protected​	Post#8​
08/10/2018​	22​	5 / 22​	7 (PDAC) + 5 (OSA) + 3 / 17​	20 / 22​	No​	Not Clean​	Protected​	Post#5​
12/10/2018​	10​	5 / 10​	3 (OSA) + 1 / 5​	9 / 10​	No​	All Clean​	Protected​	Post#7​
13/10/2018​	1​	1 / 1​	1 / 1*​	1 / 1​	No​	All Clean​ Infected*​	Clean​ Infected*​	Post#8​
13/10/2018​	2​	2 / 2​	1 / 2*​	2 / 2​	No​	All Clean​ Infected*​	Clean​ Infected*​	Post#7​
15/10/2016​	16​	7 / 16​	3 (PDAC) + 4 / 9​	14 / 16​	No​	​ Infected​	Protected​ Not Clean​	Post#6​
18/10/2018​	13​	3 / 10​	5 (PDAC) + 3 (OSA) + 2​	13 / 13​	No​	All Clean​	Protected​	Post#7​
19/10/2018​	15​	3 / 15​	6 (PDAC) + 3 / 12​	12 / 15​	No​	All Clean​	Protected​	Post#8​
19/10/2018​	1​	1 / 1​	1 / 1*​	1 / 1​	No​ Yes*​	All Clean​ Infected*​	Clean​ Infected*​	Post#9​
​ 20/10/2018​	​ 1​	​ 1 / 1​	​ 1 / 1*​	​ 1 / 1​	​ No​ ​ No​	​ All Clean​ ​ All Clean​	​ Clean​ ​ Protected​	​ Post#6​
22/10/2018​	15​	1 / 15​	11 (PDAC) + 2 (OSA) (+ 1) / 14​	14 / 15​	No​	All Clean​	Protected​	Post#6​
23/10/2018​	13​	2 / 13​	4 (PDAC) + 3 (OSA) + 1 / 11​	10 / 13​	No​	All Clean​	Protected​	Post#5​
​ 24/10/2018​	​ 1​	​ 0 / 1​	​ 1 / 1​	​ 1 / 1​	​ No​	​ All Clean​	​ Protected​	​ Post#3​
25/10/2018​	12​	3 / 12​	3 (PDAC) + 4 (OSA) + 2 / 9​	12 / 12​	No​	All Clean​	Protected​	Post#5​
27/10/2018​	3​	1 / 3​	2 (PDAC) / 2​ 2 / 3*​	3 / 3​ 2 / 3*​	No​ Yes​	All Clean​ Infected​	Protected​ Encrypted​	Post#6​
29/10/2018​	14​	3 / 14​	6 (PDAC) + 2 (OSA) + 2​	13 / 14​	No​	All Clean​	Protected​	Post#5​
31/10/2018​	16​	2 / 16​	7 (PDPAC) + 4 (OSA) + 1 / 14​	14 / 16​	No​	All Clean​	Protected​	Post#8​

 

[stefanos]

Panda Dome Premium 18 - October 2018 Report

Spoiler: FINAL STATISTICS OF THE MONTH:

Total Samples:
Total Static Detections:
Total Dynamic Detections:
Total Not Detected/Missed:
Total Detected:

Total samples pack:
Total samples pack been tested:
Total final status of the system (clean):
Total final status of the system (protected):
Total final status of the system (infected):
Total final status of the system (encrypted):

* Dynamic BB Bonus Test

October 2018	Samples Pack	Static Detection	Dynamic Detection	Total Detection	Bait Files Encrypted	2nd Opinion Scanners	System Final Status	Thread Link
01/10/2018​	19​	8 / 19​	7 / 11​	15 / 19​	No​	Infected​	Infected​	​

:emoji_disappointed:

 

[harlan4096]

PDP always fails against scripts malware samples even with AC + ForgottenSeer 58943's settings...

With AC enabled, it does well against exe files, also does enough well with infected .doc .xls and even with .jar files... but with scripts usually fails...

 

[amico81]

I have the combo PDP ( with sylguys tweaks) with OSArmor...do you think there would be better results , maybe even a clean system?

 

[harlan4096]

Probably, but We will get some warnings from OSA, that should be ignore/not create exceptions, I will perform soon some tests with PDP + OSA (Default Settings) and with SysHardened (Default Settings)

 

[amico81]

Probably, but We will get some warnings from OSA, that should be ignore/not create exceptions, I will perform soon some tests with PDP + OSA (Default Settings) and with SysHardened (Default Settings)

I look forward to see your tests and hope to read better results. Because this combo is so amazing light.
But I still have some little doubts about the protection and my second plan would be to replace Panda Dome Advanced
with Eset Nod32.
But I will wait for the future results...

 

[harlan4096]

Just installed OSA in the VM with PDP, so next samples pack will be with PDP + OSA

 

[stefanos]

 

[stefanos]

Just installed OSA in the VM with PDP, so next samples pack will be with PDP + OSA

If you want to show Panda is good product you need...... osarmor, syshardener, voodooshield, CF, hemdal pro malwarebytes pro, zemana antimalware pro, superantispyware, and after you will see maby good results

 

[stefanos]

I look forward to see your tests and hope to read better results. Because this combo is so amazing light.
But I still have some little doubts about the protection and my second plan would be to replace Panda Dome Advanced
with Eset Nod32.
But I will wait for the future results...

Eset is very good product very good signatures and light. The best choice for you. Panda for me is just money to garbage.

 

[stefanos]

https://malwaretips.com/threads/27-09-2018-16.87050/#post-767135
Static/Contextual Scan: 4 / 16 lol. same protection with » Download MalwareBuster Free

 

[amico81]

Eset is very good product very good signatures and light. The best choice for you. Panda for me is just money to garbage.

For me panda is a basic antivirus for advanced user...I'm no happy-clicker or pornsufer.
I prefer a light system and my only fear is to fall into a "phishing trap" ( i dont mean a stupid phishing mail with a poor translation or wrong sender)

 

[harlan4096]

Panda Dome has almost no offline signatures, I guess most are generic cloud ones... In fact ran an on demand offline scan and PDP even didn't detect the 8 / 19 that got being online, and all those detections where the same: Trj/GdSda.A, so PD currently is a "complete cloud dependent product"...

 

[stefanos]

For me panda is a basic antivirus for advanced user...I'm no happy-clicker or pornsufer.
I prefer a light system and my only fear is to fall into a "phishing trap" ( i dont mean a stupid phishing mail with a poor translation or wrong sender)

Friend i respect your opinion. Sure one person with experience like you maybe not need antivirus. But the antivirus program is for protection. Think about one person without experience and happy-clicker and pornsufer to choice Panda antivirus.

 

[stefanos]

Panda Dome has almost no offline signatures, I guess most are generic cloud ones... In fact ran an on demand offline scan and PDP even didn't detect the 8 / 19 that got being online, and all those detections where the same: Trj/GdSda.A, so PD currently is a "complete cloud dependent product"...

Harlan i can not accept that a free solution KFA offers better protection than the payment Panda.

 

[harlan4096]

Yes, this is/should be in general unacceptable...