Gandalf_The_Grey
Level 84
Thread author
Verified
Honorary Member
Top Poster
Content Creator
Well-known
- Apr 24, 2016
- 7,569
When PayPal acquired the shopping service and browser extension Honey, many thought that the $4 billion that the company paid was a steep price for the service.
Honey has faced its fair share off criticism in the past. A YouTuber claims now that he has uncovered deceptive business practices that impact users of the extensions but also the very people that promoted Honey.
Honey is a browser extension. Once installed, it is highlighting discounts and other beneficial codes when users visit shopping sites.
The YouTuber MegaLag claims that Honey is bad for customers, webmasters, and also influencers who advertised the service.
One of the main claims surrounds the setting of affiliate cookies. According to the information, Honey is said to save affiliate cookies on user systems unethically.
Good to know: affiliate cookies are used to determine payments to third-parties. A basic example is a webmaster to adds a link with an affiliate code to a website. When a user clicks on the link to visit the linked resource, an affiliate cookie may be placed so that the linked resource can pay the webmaster when the visitor makes purchases.
Honey is saving affiliate cookies when users activate coupons, when users use the cashback program Honey Gold, and even when there are not any discounts in the service's database and the user confirms that, according to the report.
The main issue, according to the YouTuber, is that Honey overwrites cookies from websites or other creators.
In other words: Honey will be paid when a user of the extension makes a purchase, not the webmaster or content creator who lead the visitor there. Apart from that, cookies may allow sites and marketers to track users.

PayPal-owned Honey accused of deceptive practices and more - gHacks Tech News
Shopping extension and service Honey is under fire after claims of unethical business practices emerged.
