Project NERA: State Attorneys General claim Google is planning to turn the internet into a “walled garden”

Gandalf_The_Grey

Level 53
Verified
Trusted
Content Creator
Apr 24, 2016
4,249
41,435
We have long suspected that Google’s Privacy Sandbox plans were more about enriching the company than improving the privacy of internet users.

Now 27 state attorneys have asserted the same in much more detail, claiming a vast conspiracy by Google to close off the internet and centralize all advertising under their umbrella.

Project NERA was Google’s original plan to create a closed ecosystem out of the open internet. Google documents reveal that Google’s motive was to “successfully mimic a walled garden across the open web [so] we can protect our margins.”

According to Google’s internal documents, the strategy would allow Google to extract even higher intermediation fees. A Google employee aptly described Google’s ambition for Project NERA to “capture the benefits of tightly ‘operating’ a property … without ‘owning’ the property and facing the challenges of building new consumer products.

This is similar to how Apple is able to extract massive profits from developers on the iPhone without creating the apps, while Microsoft is unable to do this on the open platform that is Windows.

Google main strategy to do this was to leverage its popular browser, Chrome, to track users, by forcing them to stay logged into the browser. Google did this by logging users into the browser when they logged into any Google property such as Gmail or YouTube, and logging them out of services when they logged out of the browser. This dark pattern funnelled users into staying logged into the browser and allowed Google to track users both on and off Google properties.

Google was then able to collect detailed data on users without the use of cookies, and sell ads against these profiles.

The Attorneys General notes that as regulatory scrutiny around Google and other Big Tech firms increased globally, Google transitioned from Project NERA to “Privacy Sandbox,” an ostensibly open standard which would still largely depend on the browser to do the tracking. This would also accelerate the preeminence of Google’s ad network by blocking 3rd party cookies used by other ad agencies.
 

rain2reign

Level 6
Jun 21, 2020
293
1,869
I have been preaching this for a long time, more than a decade, also about facebook. Yes, you can use some their services and whatnot. Hell, even I use some of Google's services like everyone other person, because there is no proper alternative sometimes.

Though fully relying on a private company for everything... Of course, they're going to exploit every advantage they're given. In fact, we give it to them on a golden platter and don't think twice about it. And people call me crazy or discriminating against those two companies for wanting more competition out there, rather than convenience.
 

Kubla

Level 8
Verified
Jan 22, 2017
379
1,016
How very China of them, the even scarier part is how easily they buy up our elected officials, so there is not only no one to stop them, they help them, Google and Facebook write regulations that our government officials put into place to make them even more powerful.

The US is no longer ran by a Federal government put in place by the people, it is ran by a corporate board of directors made up of the highest bidders.
 

The_King

Level 12
Verified
Aug 2, 2020
551
6,124
The vast amount of user data obtained by big tech/social media companies like Facebook and Google
can be used to study social behavior on a global scale and even misuse this data collected
to influence society on a larger scale. (This is why privacy issues became a thing)

Take Amazon that claim they are not using there customer data to sell there own products.

Governments are now aware that these companies can even influence outcomes of elections through their influence on social media platforms.

Knowledge is power. Absolute power, corrupts absolutely.
 
Top