Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Malware Analysis
"pyrate", Behavior Blocker Bypass POC #3
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MacDefender" data-source="post: 880812" data-attributes="member: 83059"><p>I am curious what they will end up saying. As much as I am an ESET fan, I think they like to say “it’s not real malware” as a convenient excuse.</p><p></p><p>But if they add a static detection I am 99% confident that I could change my malicious script to avoid it — I was able to do that with my previous binary exploit and that is arguably harder:<a href="https://malwaretips.com/threads/trojanzipperpoc-and-eset-signatures-case-study.100386/" target="_blank">TrojanZipperPOC and ESET signatures Case Study</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MacDefender, post: 880812, member: 83059"] I am curious what they will end up saying. As much as I am an ESET fan, I think they like to say “it’s not real malware” as a convenient excuse. But if they add a static detection I am 99% confident that I could change my malicious script to avoid it — I was able to do that with my previous binary exploit and that is arguably harder:[URL="https://malwaretips.com/threads/trojanzipperpoc-and-eset-signatures-case-study.100386/"]TrojanZipperPOC and ESET signatures Case Study[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
