Hello
This is my setup configuration security
This is my setup configuration security
Based on his configuration, it seems he prioritizes privacy over lightweight performance; in that case, Portmaster would be a better fit.Fort firewall is lighter than Portmaster but the downside it has to install its driver which will force you to turn off core isolation as it is not signed nor allowed by MS.
Is fort firewall conflicting with privacy?Based on his configuration, it seems he prioritizes privacy over lightweight performance; in that case, Portmaster would be a better fit.![]()
No, I didn't mean that there was a privacy issue with the Fort firewall, but Portmaster is more of a privacy tool than a regular firewall. It has a secure DNS and built-in ad/tracker filters, so for example, it will block Microsoft Edge tracking data without affecting the update process and without any manual configuration from the user. That's what I meant.Is fort firewall conflicting with privacy?
For data storage I prefer the old HDDs. The only downside is data transfer speed. External SSDs prices are insane.I think the popular size now is 2TB for external SSD's. Use that for image backups.
Thankfully I managed get a shockproof silicone case for my external HDD and I dropped it many times. It is working without any issues.I use external HDD's too. Because it is a little cheaper and should last longer too. But I am contemplating SSD's because I bring the external HDD's with me (as off site backup ) and it gets banged and tossed about.