Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Real World, Evasive Malware and Performance Test by Trident
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trident" data-source="post: 1033481" data-attributes="member: 99014"><p>Unfortunately all three left the system compromised. Norton had more misses on this occasion than F-secure and Kaspersky and I did not tweak Application Control here, all products are tested with their default settings. Because the samples were not many (I could've done a large pack but that would not be evasive, it will be packed with well known malware), there is no point to count hits and misses. Rather it is a pass and fail situation. Apart from Bitdefender, they all failed. Needles to say is that users absolutely do not need the Java platform. Users can install it and block the Javaw.exe execution. Not installing it at all is not protection, as malware can easily download it and launch the installer with an /s argument (silent).</p><p></p><p>To be honest, they all did better than I expected them to do on this test.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trident, post: 1033481, member: 99014"] Unfortunately all three left the system compromised. Norton had more misses on this occasion than F-secure and Kaspersky and I did not tweak Application Control here, all products are tested with their default settings. Because the samples were not many (I could've done a large pack but that would not be evasive, it will be packed with well known malware), there is no point to count hits and misses. Rather it is a pass and fail situation. Apart from Bitdefender, they all failed. Needles to say is that users absolutely do not need the Java platform. Users can install it and block the Javaw.exe execution. Not installing it at all is not protection, as malware can easily download it and launch the installer with an /s argument (silent). To be honest, they all did better than I expected them to do on this test. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
