Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Real-World & Malware Protection Tests September 2018
Message
<blockquote data-quote="509322" data-source="post: 771262"><p>The funny thing is, most of the people who buy and use the soft don't care. It is the security soft geeks who seek perfection or whatever it is that drives their internals that have emotional meltdowns.</p><p></p><p>It's default allow. What does anyone expect ? The expectations, plus the mental and emotional involvement are I don't know what... there is something really disturbing about it all. That people react so strongly and carry on as they do on some of these threads... it is obvious that a whole bunch of maladaptive stuff is going on.</p><p></p><p>Some people will switch because there is only a 1 % or less difference between AV-Y and AV-Z.</p><p></p><p>Some people freak out because AV-Z fails - at Office exploits for example - but they don't even have Office installed on their system. Still they will dump the security soft "Just because... it must be flawed in other unknown, hidden ways" Wut ? That is ludicrous.</p><p></p><p>Some people cannot cope with the idea of inert malware on their system. Even worse is botched malware that runs, but does nothing. Some people have massive brain hemorrhages if an AV allows inert malware or malware that sits there and does nothing. Any security soft that allows such things... gotta switch immediately.</p><p></p><p>Some people are hurt when there beloved soft doesn't do so good. And with some, if there is a bypass or something is said that the person just doesn't like, oh... look out. Time for multi-cross-forum dramas.</p><p></p><p>I could go on for quite a long time here, but my finger tips would get too sore.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="509322, post: 771262"] The funny thing is, most of the people who buy and use the soft don't care. It is the security soft geeks who seek perfection or whatever it is that drives their internals that have emotional meltdowns. It's default allow. What does anyone expect ? The expectations, plus the mental and emotional involvement are I don't know what... there is something really disturbing about it all. That people react so strongly and carry on as they do on some of these threads... it is obvious that a whole bunch of maladaptive stuff is going on. Some people will switch because there is only a 1 % or less difference between AV-Y and AV-Z. Some people freak out because AV-Z fails - at Office exploits for example - but they don't even have Office installed on their system. Still they will dump the security soft "Just because... it must be flawed in other unknown, hidden ways" Wut ? That is ludicrous. Some people cannot cope with the idea of inert malware on their system. Even worse is botched malware that runs, but does nothing. Some people have massive brain hemorrhages if an AV allows inert malware or malware that sits there and does nothing. Any security soft that allows such things... gotta switch immediately. Some people are hurt when there beloved soft doesn't do so good. And with some, if there is a bypass or something is said that the person just doesn't like, oh... look out. Time for multi-cross-forum dramas. I could go on for quite a long time here, but my finger tips would get too sore. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top