Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Real-World & Malware Protection Tests September 2018
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shmu26" data-source="post: 771322" data-attributes="member: 37647"><p>Why not consider it? Together with test results over a few months, of course.</p><p>All tests have their drawbacks. For instance, malware hub testing does not accurately represent real-life conditions. They download zipped folders of malware and run them one after another on desktop. Not exactly what a typical user would do.</p><p>You get my point? There is something to be learned from the various testing methods. They all need a little salt.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shmu26, post: 771322, member: 37647"] Why not consider it? Together with test results over a few months, of course. All tests have their drawbacks. For instance, malware hub testing does not accurately represent real-life conditions. They download zipped folders of malware and run them one after another on desktop. Not exactly what a typical user would do. You get my point? There is something to be learned from the various testing methods. They all need a little salt. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
