It's okay ? Or recommend an adjustment. Thank you.
Recommended setting for System Watcher in Kaspersky Total Security
- Thread starter Artificial intelligence
- Start date
- Status
- Jan 24, 2011
- 9,378
Hello,
I cannot understand Spanish but it looks good. To really improve your system security you should look at Kaspersky's Application Control settings, that's were you can do the most work, here is a guide to help you - How to setup Kaspersky Internet Security 2016 for Maximum Protection (Guide) - it's for KIS 2016, but it should work for 2017 as well!
@harlan4096 may also give you some great tips on how to better configure Kaspersky.
I cannot understand Spanish but it looks good. To really improve your system security you should look at Kaspersky's Application Control settings, that's were you can do the most work, here is a guide to help you - How to setup Kaspersky Internet Security 2016 for Maximum Protection (Guide) - it's for KIS 2016, but it should work for 2017 as well!
@harlan4096 may also give you some great tips on how to better configure Kaspersky.
I already made the settings described, it's the first thing I did. Thanks.
- Feb 13, 2017
- 1,486
I missed that, thanks @Jack! Awesome guide in case I will switch to Kaspersky 
I have to say that my indicators are pointing towards that direction
I have to say that my indicators are pointing towards that direction
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,655
In case of module "System Watcher", defaults settings are ok and should not be changed...
- Jul 3, 2015
- 8,153
@harlan4096, what about the idea of using Application Control to put script interpreters in the High Restricted category? What do you say about that kind of a tweak?
I even put cmd.exe in High Restricted, and everything still works fine, and my apps that use cmd.exe are still able to function normally.
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,655
@shmu26: I guess You did that because the last special sample I tested yesterday night that tried to Exploit cmd.exe. We have been testing at MWHub lately some similar/variants samples (usually .doc) that tried the same.
As You can see, in every case KTS2018 (and I guess also K2017 would do the same) in default settings detected the attack and blocked it without having signatures...
If that "strong tweak" is working fine for now for You, that's great... anyway I'm not sure whether You will have any issue in future with any other applications or Windows working, please let us know...
As You can see, in every case KTS2018 (and I guess also K2017 would do the same) in default settings detected the attack and blocked it without having signatures...
If that "strong tweak" is working fine for now for You, that's great... anyway I'm not sure whether You will have any issue in future with any other applications or Windows working, please let us know...
Last edited:
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,655
As I already said before in post#5, I would stay at default settings in "System Watcher" module in general, although I have all those settings in "Prompt for Action" in my working system, because I am in "Interactive Mode"
Last edited:
Returning to the default setting. ThanksAs I already said before in post#5, I would stay at default settings in "System Watcher" module, anyway I have all those settings in "Prompt for Action" in my working system, because I am in "Interactive Mode"
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,655
- Jul 3, 2015
- 8,153
Thanks, and it wasn't because of your latest test, it is just my general paranoia about script interpreters. Whatever my security config may be, I always try to get them under control.
Almost all users could block or restrict wscript and cscript and powershell without any issues, and that will make it really hard for malware to download and run payloads, or hack the registry etc.
The touchy process is cmd.exe. So far, I haven't had any problems, but potentially, it could cause issues.
- Status
