- Jul 31, 2014
- 1,086
SecureMyBit Deny review
VirusTotal link of the EXE file: VirusTotal
NIce software @JM Security, well done!
VirusTotal link of the EXE file: VirusTotal
NIce software @JM Security, well done!
From what I know SMB D blocks all scripts by default by disabling Windows Script Host, however if you want to run a trusted script you can easily disable Anti-Script protection from the GUI.Thanks for the video.
Is SecureMyBit Deny able to detect if the JavaScript is malicious or is it just blocking all JavaScript from running?
Okay. Thanks for the info.From what I know SMB D blocks all scripts by default by disabling Windows Script Host, however if you want to run a trusted script you can easily disable Anti-Script protection from the GUI.
A test is done to verify if a product really works as expected. In the video @tim one tested if the Anti-Script protection really works. So I don't see the sense of your question. Also Default-Deny of EXE files are tested.I really don't want to be rude but did you really do a test of executing 5 js files while the tool clearly states it blocks every js file upon execution?
Hi cruelsister, when you open SMB D in the UI, if you move the mouse on "Anti-Script" button, you can see it blocks JS, VBS, JSE, etc. But not wscript or cscript. This depends on @JM Security development.Tim- bat files are still used today (actually someone just sent me a fresh one for an opinion); and for these SMB would be oblivious.
So one really should differentiate between scriptors that use cscript/wscript and those that do not.
I have been running my machine with both the underlined "as well as other vulnerable processes" disabled for well over a year, with no issues. Something to consider @JM SecurityBut not wscript or cscript. This depends on @JM Security development.
Yes, I also think SecureMyBit Deny can be a good addition to a security setup, but surely the developers could improve the product to improve protection scenarios.Hi Tim! Disabling Windows Script Host on systems that rely on traditional methods of protection (such as an AV and/or BB) is a good thing. As those few who view my videos may have noticed (my last video as well as the forthcoming one), many products have issues with Scriptors.
The majority of scriptors currently in the Wild are vb and JScript based. SMB would be a nice compliment as it will stop these things cold; however with bat scripts, some self contained python malware and JAR (not Jscript) malware SMB will not really help.
Don't get me wrong! I compliment you for bringing up the need for basic Scriptor protection! However SMB over all is sub-optimal when compared to the Bliss of virtualization.