- Aug 5, 2012
- 42
Shadow Defender - real-time test(andrzejc76)
- Thread starter SecurityChecks
- Start date
It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
RE: Shadow Defender - real-time test.
may i have the translation at the end?
Btw, which version did you use? if it was the .331, i will reconsider the result since this version is suspicious because it appears from nowhere and the code was lightened; not to mention that the original developers is missing and the .331 appears suddenly after.
may i have the translation at the end?
Btw, which version did you use? if it was the .331, i will reconsider the result since this version is suspicious because it appears from nowhere and the code was lightened; not to mention that the original developers is missing and the .331 appears suddenly after.
- Aug 5, 2012
- 42
RE: Shadow Defender - real-time test.
So this version of the 331 but not less as I know most use this version.
This version was checked repeatedly, including by me - is not hacked, nor suspicious, and nothing is in it sewn up. I suspect that the result would be identical 325 version, but nevertheless did not conduct such a test.
So this version of the 331 but not less as I know most use this version.
This version was checked repeatedly, including by me - is not hacked, nor suspicious, and nothing is in it sewn up. I suspect that the result would be identical 325 version, but nevertheless did not conduct such a test.
RE: Shadow Defender - real-time test.
ok, i trust you, after reading the 48 pages on Wilders about it, i am quite suspicious ^^
what was the last comment on the video? (about the result?)
ok, i trust you, after reading the 48 pages on Wilders about it, i am quite suspicious ^^
what was the last comment on the video? (about the result?)
- Aug 5, 2012
- 42
Under my video has no comments, no less but the last test I've seen shows that Shadow Defender 325 version is unfortunately broken by bootkit and is from 2006.
Wilders says it is not but it's worth something is not something to read, but nevertheless there is nothing like your insights and analysis.
Wilders says it is not but it's worth something is not something to read, but nevertheless there is nothing like your insights and analysis.
InternetChicken
New Member
- Jul 16, 2012
- 519
- Aug 5, 2012
- 42
@Umbra Corp. - " but if you say that v331 is clean i will upgrade. "
I used a long version of the 331, have not seen any suspicious Internet Connection, no anomaly indicating that the "rummage" in your computer, you can also upgrade to 331 without fear.
I used a long version of the 331, have not seen any suspicious Internet Connection, no anomaly indicating that the "rummage" in your computer, you can also upgrade to 331 without fear.
Just did it i observe it uses twice the amount of RAM (WS) after the reboot than the beta v.326, i will recheck later when my system will be idle.
i observe it uses twice the amount of RAM (WS) after the reboot than the beta v.326, i will recheck later when my system will be idle.
- Aug 5, 2012
- 42
I'm sorry I can not relate to it because I used only the 331 version, but I think that the "calm down" and be no difference in the collection of RAM your computer - which collects and so if he drew resources from the air.
Similar threads
