Should Comodo users stop using Comodo?

[Pico]

almost none of those bugs have been re-reported on the Comodo forum

Because nobody ever wants to do that again for reasons I've said earlier.
That's part of Comodo tactic just neglect / ignore most of the bugs and make users tired of submtiting bug reports, just fix the vulnerabilities.

 

[simmerskool]

That is why you would lose the case in court.

imo your comment "That is why you would lose the case in court" adds nothing to the discussion you want be having... imo_fwiw.

 

[rashmi]

When is the Movie available for streaming from this Thread ?

"The Ba***ds of Comodo Thread" is in the final editing stages!

 

[Divergent]

"The Ba***ds of Comodo Thread" is in the final editing stages!

This is exactly the kind of input this thread needed. Thanks for bringing some real substance to the table.

 

[Divergent]

As spoken by the new MWT Bot.

Impressive collection of zingers. Are you going to grace us with a complete thought, or is this the entire performance?

 

[Andy Ful]

Because nobody ever wants to do that again for reasons I've said earlier.
That's part of Comodo tactic just neglect / ignore most of the bugs and make users tired of submtiting bug reports, just fix the vulnerabilities.

This can be true assuming that Comodo is bad. You understand that I cannot use this argument.

 

[Divergent]

imo your comment "That is why you would lose the case in court" adds nothing to the discussion you want be having... imo_fwiw.

Why bother arguing? You know his move, deflect and blame

 

[Andy Ful]

I would like to recall that posting something that contradicts rule number 2 from the OP is completely counterproductive in this thread.
I cannot use such a post to prove that Comodo is "bad". I think that the best I can do is point out what in the post contradicts rule 2 and not comment on the post.

I may fail to prove that Comodo is "bad" due to the lack of posts that are consistent with rule 2 from the OP.

 

[Andy Ful]

imo your comment "That is why you would lose the case in court" adds nothing to the discussion you want be having... imo_fwiw.

Yes, it is a rhetorical statement. In this thread, I use rule 2, which is similar to the "presumption of innocence" in the law.

 

[Trident]

I can only make people laugh. Because the situation calls for laughter.

 

[TuxTalk]

I can only make people laugh. Because the situation calls for laughter.

View attachment 291357

View attachment 291358

 

[Antimalware18]

I quit using comodo a year or more ago, really got tired of it forgetting rules i had set. as well as other annoying bugs. so i bought a copy of Cyberlock (then voodooshield) and replaced the firewall portion with WFC the AV is interchangeable

 

[Andy Ful]

I can only make people laugh. Because the situation calls for laughter.

View attachment 291357

This probably will not happen due to the lack of posts that are consistent with the "presumption of innocence".

 

[Andy Ful]

The good news for some MT members is that several posts in this thread would contradict the initial assumption that Comodo is excellent.
So, reasoning by the reductio ad absurdum method would prove that Comodo is not excellent.

 

[Divergent]

 

[Andy Ful]

View attachment 291364

It will be interesting to see if this fantasy will become true.

 

[bazang]

With utmost respect, you seem not to listen to moderators (this thread is an example).

The MT moderators have said nothing to me. I do adhere what they tell me to do. You set the rules for this thread, and I do not think that any MT member should have that power - on MT Owners and staff. Only an MT Owner or staff member should have the prerogative to dictate to other members any rules, conduct, or Terms of Service.

But to your credit, I understand the intent of your rules. I just don't want to follow them. I will once you become a MT Owner or staff member.

I would expect, that naturally you would interpret my posts and think that I'm attempting to be disrespectful and/or undermine what you're doing here on this thread, but really, with utmost respect and honesty, I am not.

I am only interested in what it legal. If MT Owners or staff grant you the power to dictate rules of participation, then that is their prerogative, but that is my queue to "Exit Left" - with haste. As in "Run Forest, Run!"

Your thread "rules" are already enshrined in MT's existing Terms of Service and other policies. There's no need to repeat them. And there's certainly no need to harangue MT staff repeatedly about posts that you disagree with and quote "Rule 2" or "Rule XYZ" of your posted thread rules. I, and others, don't recognize the legitimacy of those rules. You are absolutely not wrong in what you're attempting to do, but any member dictating rules and behavior is "out of bounds" and not their privilege.

This is a good point to discuss in another thread. We do not have a good method on MT to discuss hot topics. The posts that contradict the rules are treated here as off-topic. This thread is kinda experimental because other threads failed.

Well, forums and social media, there's no way to control content and member behavior other than constant vigilance and moderation. That's not an easy task, and hence my suggestion to use an AI/LMM Bot to be the thread/post/content police.

What you are attempting to do is admirable as a notion, but highly problematic in practice.

Yes, the rules should be accepted by the staff. It would be good to work on an acceptable ruleset. I do not insist on the correctness of the rules in this thread.

There's no easy solution. Be too heavy handed, and people will complain their "Freeze Speach" rights have been violated.

Guess what? Nobody has any "Freeze Speach" rights on MT or most anywhere else for that matter.

Trying to control the zoo animals is a futile enterprise.

I will not comment on this. You can probably get an answer from the staff. For the record, none of your posts were censored in any way, even if the author of the thread thinks that most of what you posted here is off-topic. Only a few posts of some other member were deleted by the staff on my request (and maybe on the request of others).

Truly, I mean nothing by it and not a any criticism or dig directed towards you - but I don't need an answer from staff. I know the statutes and regulations inside-out, frontward and backward.

ANY modification of user posted content AND a pattern of modify or amending any user's posted content (which MT has a well established, trackable history of doing so) is a violation the world over, except in nations such as Angola, China, Syria, Peru, and Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia - and nations of that totalitarian way of governance. Even in pseudo-authoritarian nations such as Turkiye, site owners modifying user posted content is a violation. Now the government has the free will and prerogative to do - essentially - what it wants. Which is true of most nations, including "democracies".

I mean no disrespect and not trying to derail what you're trying to do in this thread.

Lock ?

There is a very important policy and principle that I am addressing. Normally policies and principles are only the prerogative of a site owner or their designated representatives. Individual site members never have the right to tamper or usurp those Owner rights.

Perhaps just stay out of it? Nothing that is being posted should bother you. If it does, then stay off the thread and don't read any of it.

Not a single word of that statement is intended to offend, upset, or otherwise irk you.

 

[Pico]

This can be true assuming that Comodo is bad. You understand that I cannot use this argument.

What makes Comodo bad herein? I've never seen Comodo doing any better than this.

 

[bazang]

I've never seen Comodo doing any better than this.

And you never will. Comodo software will NEVER - EVER - be any better than it is at the moment.

 

[Divergent]

It will be interesting to see if this fantasy will become true.

I wouldn’t call this interesting, more like something I hope we never see. And just to be clear, I’m not advocating anyone get infected to prove a point.