App Review Simple Emsisoft Internet Security 11 review

[MiguelPratas819]

 

[MikeV]

Nice test Miguel, i hope to watch more tests from you.
Emsisoft is a good product indeed.

Suggestions:
- Please show us the memory usage of each product you test.
- Please use a second opinion scanner (like Zemana,Hitman Pro etc...) at the end of the video, to verify that the system is clean.

All the best

 

[MiguelPratas819]

Nice test Miguel, i hope to watch more tests from you.
Emsisoft is a good product indeed.

Suggestions:
- Please show us the memory usage of each product you test.
- Please use a second opinion scanner (like Zemana,Hitman Pro etc...) at the end of the video, to verify that the system is clean.

All the best

Ty very much. Appreciate your suggestions but in this case the 2nd one doesnt make sense since i didnt infect the system just downloaded files..I didnt run them .I could say it was an incomplete review ty.

 

[SloppyMcFloppy]

Another suggestions:

1) Get more malware samples, i expect you should get like 500 or 1000 of them to test for the detection ratio.

2) Please test Emsisoft Behavior Blocker.

 

[Anupam]

Nice review. Are you reviewing in you main system? I can see so many software already installed.

 

[MiguelPratas819]

Nice review. Are you reviewing in you main system? I can see so many software already installed.

Yes this review, since it was just a simple detection rate test, was made on my main system xD
If was doing something like a Behavior blocker test...It wouldn't be on my main system
Since I made a clean install to windows 10 Build 10586 and I didn't have much time to install a VM, It was also good for compatibility Test.

 

[Deleted member 178]

Another suggestions:

1) Get more malware samples, i expect you should get like 500 or 1000 of them to test for the detection ratio.

pointless, in real time scenario ,nobody get infected by such a number of malwares...10 to 20 of zero/one/two-days malwares is enough.

 

[cruelsister]

Absolutely- Quality, not Quantity.

 

[SloppyMcFloppy]

pointless, in real time scenario ,nobody get infected by such a number of malwares...10 to 20 of zero/one/two-days malwares is enough.

Stress test > Quick test because stress test give us more information of the antivirus vendor signatures whether is good or not. And i doubt any antivirus can give a fly score with just 10 to 20, but when it come something like 200+ it probably fail to detect half of them.

 

[Deleted member 178]

Stress test > Quick test because stress test give us more information of the antivirus vendor signatures whether is good or not. And i doubt any antivirus can give a fly score with just 10 to 20, but when it come something like 200+ it probably fail to detect half of them.

Detecting 200 old malwares that every others vendors detects, still pointless.

anyway relying on signatures is already pointless now, signatures-based AVs are relics of the past. any properly made FUD malware will bypass any of them.