Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Hard_Configurator Tools
Simple Windows Hardening
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 978504" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>I would like to add some more comments to the problem of "context".</p><p><strong>In their simplest form, both the SRP approach and Parent/Child + CmdLines solutions are kinda dumb when dealing with the "context". </strong>So, the Administrators must add some "context" by using their knowledge to create the rules or the cloud backend has to be used to see the different contexts of benign and malicious actions. But, why does Microsoft still like the SRP approach? The answer is pretty much simple. Microsoft uses Local AI, ASR rules, AMSI, and cloud backend to enhance Parent/Child + CmdLines solutions. The SRP + "system hardening via Policies" is an additional & important protection layer, based on a different approach.</p><p></p><p>In SWH (and H_C) I followed a similar security approach (AV + SRP + basic hardening) and adjusted it to the home environment with a home Administrator.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 978504, member: 32260"] I would like to add some more comments to the problem of "context". [B]In their simplest form, both the SRP approach and Parent/Child + CmdLines solutions are kinda dumb when dealing with the "context". [/B]So, the Administrators must add some "context" by using their knowledge to create the rules or the cloud backend has to be used to see the different contexts of benign and malicious actions. But, why does Microsoft still like the SRP approach? The answer is pretty much simple. Microsoft uses Local AI, ASR rules, AMSI, and cloud backend to enhance Parent/Child + CmdLines solutions. The SRP + "system hardening via Policies" is an additional & important protection layer, based on a different approach. In SWH (and H_C) I followed a similar security approach (AV + SRP + basic hardening) and adjusted it to the home environment with a home Administrator.(y) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top